this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
205 points (98.1% liked)

News

27517 readers
5240 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Harvard announced that, starting in the 2025-2026 academic year, it will not charge tuition for students from families earning under $200,000.

Students from households making less than $100,000 will attend for free. Previously, free tuition applied only to families earning under $85,000.

The expansion aims to make Harvard more accessible to middle-income families.

This follows similar moves by other wealthy universities, including MIT, which expanded its financial aid last November.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Student: My family lives there and I live here. We don't interact. Why would their wealth be of any importance if I couldn't have a cent out of it?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

If you don't interact with them then that means you are feeding yourself, which means you have a job.

Congrats you aren't making more than 200k. Enjoy.

Not that complicate is it? Now if you are there and your parent are the way the fuck over there and you are sucking on the tit then you will add your parents income.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There has to be some objective method of categorising whether someone lives off their parents income or not: it's a relevant question to ask.

Someone can live in the same house as their parents while paying full rent and being responsible for their own food, effectively being economically independent. They can also live on the other side of the country while being 100% sponsored by their parents. It's not trivial to categorise whether someone qualifies for something like this.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes, and the federal government already has a way to make that determination. I forget what it is because it's been years, but they have one.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

I still think it's a fair question to ask, because as far as I understand, there's nothing forcing Harvard to use the same method as the federal government. Have you seen anything on how they plan to do that?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's a relevant question to ask if we want to continue with the system of paying for higher education. Which maybe we don't. You don't pay for high school.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

It's a relevant question either way: Regardless whether you think all education should be free (which I agree, it should), this is about how they plan on resolving this specific case of making education more accessible right now.

Whether education should be free altogether is a whole different question. In that case, it would make sense to also discuss whether it should be free for everyone, or whether there should be some income limit.

In Norway we've landed on a solution where the education itself is free, but in order to qualify for a government stipend and government-backed loan (with very good interest rates) in order to support yourself studying you need to have a fortune below a certain (high) threshold. Personally, I think that's a nice trade off between accessibility and preventing rich people from making money off of a welfare program.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

The student doesn't pay for highschool, but there are still fees. My income was low enough that they waived the (roughly) $500-700 a year though. They based it off the paperwork to qualify for free/reduced lunches.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

idk how it works in the US but in the UK you have to provide evidence that you've been living without any family support for more than 3 years, I had a housemate who had to work every hour he didn't have lectures because he'd only been on his own for 2 and a half years. Granted that it only affected his maintenance loan and not the tuition loan but he still couldn't afford to eat.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Not that complicate is it?

And what stops every student from saying that they're on their own? I came here with a simple and logical question. I expect answers, not sarcasm.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

They will ask you for your taxes for previous years that shows you as being on your own. There are teens that do get emancipated from the parents before 18, which they also have to show they can live and support themselves.

FAFSA, don't know if it will continue to be alive since these assholes are destroying everything will ask you these questions. California also had a CCC program that use to help with getting free college. If so depends on your state as well.

My bad for sounding like a dick.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Every student could apply for parent-independent support. There are processes from other countries to learn from.