this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2025
711 points (98.4% liked)

News

24715 readers
4243 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not just tracking cookies, but browser fingerprinting.

Not just Google, but now Cloudflare.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It's a free service that's been provided to website makers to easily add a way to reduce bot spam. And for a very long time, it worked

Captcha got tonnes of free training data, and in return website maintainer got an incredibly handy free tool to help secure their site.

Captcha 100% could have charged licensing for their tool, could charged money for developers to use their service.

They didn't, and I think it's perfectly reasonable they got the training data as "payment" instead.

Your favorite free websites you use get to have another part of their architecture stay free.

The website maintainer get an awesome free tool.

Captcha got training data to profit off of.

That's good internet where everyone wins without the need for bullshit licensing and fees and royalties and subscriptions.

Would you have rather your Netflix account cost an extra 15 cents per month or whatever to offset yet another licensing cost for some captcha tool?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Would you have rather your Netflix account cost an extra 15 cents per month or whatever to offset yet another licensing cost for some captcha tool?

Err... couldn't the corporation just make less profit but still provide the service as-is?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

That's the neat thing; it won't.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago

Right let's get everyone to reinvent the wheel

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Captcha was never good at stopping bots. It was always used to identify who is a human. In other words exactly the opposite of what you think.

Edit: because I see confusion, maybe a language barrier, here is an example of what people think it is and how it works: https://youtube.com/shorts/rme6PT7-CRI Which is wrong on many levels.

Here is a better explanation of what I meant: https://youtu.be/VTsBP21-XpI

Hope this explains it better than my original comment.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I can personally confirm it very much did help curb botting issues on my website.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Seconded, websites with logins are practically unusable without the tool. We had to disable it once and our database got flooded by unverified accounts. Absolutely awful.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I have edited my original comment, but this will explain it much better and showcase my statement much better: https://youtu.be/VTsBP21-XpI

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That doesn't make sense. There are only bots and humans. Identifying humans is stopping bots, and vice versa.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I have edited my comment. You can check this video which will explain it much better than myself: https://youtu.be/VTsBP21-XpI

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

CAPTCHAs make web sites awful to use, and waste the limited lifespans of billions of people.

There are other ways to manage bots.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not easily, and not at the time, no, it really was a very easy way to quickly reduce bot problems at the time.

You'd get random spam for stuff that could flood your forums or etc, and setting up captcha had an extremely immediate and palpable effect on reducing the spam that came in from random bot farms and shit.

I can personally confirm that when I implemented captcha on my forums i maintained 14 years ago, it pretty substantially reduced spammers by a huge degree.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There's no point in arguing what once was. Things have changed. CAPTCHAs are now less effective, far more invasive, and for many people, far more troublesome.

Cling to them if you like. I no longer use them on any of my sites, because I care about my users.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not a website administrator so I'm out of the loop. Other ways to manage bots? Like what?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

What will be effective depends on the nature of the site and that of the bots causing trouble. For example, a forum can limit posting privileges until an account builds a reputation, a paid goods/services site can restrict access until a purchase is made, a web service can use revocable credentials, and a data download site can use rate limits. (That last one is actually useful in a variety of situations, and can be done at the network level instead of or in addition to the application level.)

There is no silver bullet, but there are lots of small measures that can be very effective when applied thoughtfully, without turning a site into a frustrating-to-use surveillance tool for Google at the expense of the humans who want to or have to use it.

Even a small, locally hosted, activate-only-once, simple image or text-based CAPTCHA would be preferable to the ones operated by third parties.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Thank you for the thorough reply!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So all I need to do to bot your sites is to farm accounts? Easy enough, people do that on Instagram at huge scales.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Good luck. You'll find that your farmed accounts can't do much of anything, and will be quickly and automatically deleted.