this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
68 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13604 readers
765 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I announce that his folk hero status has now been revoked.

ban-hammer

Just another jilted alt right dude who was fine when he thought the system was for him and then got burned and lashed out.

No praxis, only edge and entitlement.

My authority to decide this? None, don't @ me.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I believe in separating the art from the artist.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I refuse this notion as that's what a lot of Harry Potter fans say to justify their bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

They are the bad takes haver after all

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Except death of the author doesn’t make sense with Harry Potter because Rowling’s worldview drips from those fucking books.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

That's not what death of the author is about barthes-shining

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Death of the author doesn't make any sense for anything. The art is created by the artist, imo it's inseparable.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

absolutely, this is just the one exception

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Guess what he rated as 5 stars on good reads :-)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

It's locked down now, but this is a screenshot I managed to grab chatting with a friend (unfortunately doesn't have provenance attached so you'll have to trust me).

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

I guess this is what happens the second they read another book.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Hilarious, thank you

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Uh aktually, the first three Harry Potter books are good for what they are.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

LMAO! Wonder what his opinion on Fight Club is 😂

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Thats bad art with or without jk ratfuck

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Never read the books or watched the movies but something about the protrayal of the goblins rubbed me the wrong way.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The weirdest one for me is the guy who wrote Altered Carbon. Who is a transphobic centrist who wrote three books about how transhumanist Maoists are cool and good (apparently wasn't his intention).

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Being a centrist usually requires a ton of "communism bad" brainworms and being a transphobe always requires a ton of patriarchal brainworms. Neither of these are opinions you arrive at rationally, they are the result of people taking a wrong intellectual turn due to indoctrination, and both of these wrong turns can be found among all kinds of people, even those who in theory agree that Maoist goals and bodily autonomy are cool and good. These people will only agree these principles are cool and good as long as they are not exposed to the socially ingrained triggers of their fears, like a crowd of workers waving red banners, or people transing their gender.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Chuds really ruined that phrase, for sure. It's for shaking your head while reading Mists of Avalon on the bus, not cosplaying as a fascist kid wizard.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

shaking your head while reading Mists of Avalon

That was 100% my reaction when I was reading that and in a world of Lothars and Morgaines and Taleisins we are introduced to a guy named "Kevin."