this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
70 points (98.6% liked)

chapotraphouse

13530 readers
166 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm not going to either. You can't make me. I can't even imagine what it sounds like and I won't try.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Just cause the libs taint trends in music and pop culture like this doesn't mean it's bad

tbf the artist also tainted it with that association.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

still doesn't make it bad. if you're gonna say all liberal music is bad, then you're gonna have a hard time finding music to listen to.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not talking about the work itself, I mean that psychologically the association was pushed by the artist, who is popularly regarded as the main authority on a piece, saying that "candidate embodies the spirit of my album". I'm speaking on the level of rhetoric here.

That said, it's extremely easy to find music from people who don't fellate reactionaries like that, even if they're still liberals or whatever.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I disagree bc as a longtime Charli fan I see it more like she made a shit post and then the desperate Democrats went way too far with it. It's not like she's posting like Stephen King about how great the Democrats are all the time. She made one post and then went back to doing coke with her DJ fiancee.

Making one post on Twitter is not "fellating reactionaries" and it's extremely misogynistic to frame it this way

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

I’d say her explicit participation in, and encouragement of, the entertainment industry’s rampant sex abuse is a bit reactionary as well to be fair