124
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

https://archive.ph/tR7s6

Get fuuuuuuuuuuuuuucked

“This isn’t going to stop,” Allen told the New York Times. “Art is dead, dude. It’s over. A.I. won. Humans lost.”

"But I still want to get paid for it."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

That’s not what I’m saying though. It’s more that I think arguing for better protections under IP law is akin to participating in get out the vote campaigns for democrats. If the goal is to better conditions for working people including artists, neither of those avenues will lead you anywhere.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Again.

Post your your supposed "solutions" to advocate for.

Otherwise you still read like you're a treat printer enjoyer that wants everyone to stop complaining, no matter how the planet burns.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

You’re only reading me that way because you’re lumping my arguments in with all the pro AI nonsense that’s out there. I honestly don’t care for any of the slop AI models tend to produce and it’s not reasonable to assume that I do.

Also my arguments stand on their own. Even if there are no near term solutions to the plight of artists that doesn’t mean reifying the concept of intellectual property is worth anything.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Also my arguments stand on their own.

Then stop bullshitting and actually provide what I asked for. Post your supposed "solutions" to advocate for.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

That’s irrelevant to the legitimacy of my argument. I can tell you rhino horn isn’t going to fix your love life without telling you what will. That said I’m an ML. I don’t believe most artists will be fairly compensated for their labor until we can actually abolish capitalism.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

That’s irrelevant to the legitimacy of my argument.

You DID NOT provide ANY complete argument. Are there no solutions that you had to propose to begin with?

Thought so.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

I mean if you don’t want to read what I wrote you can claim I never wrote anything at all I guess.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You told everyone to stop complaining and vaguely hinted at "solutions" that you did not provide.

Maybe those "solutions" aren't there because you fucking couldn't think of them.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

You told everyone to stop complaining

I never said people should stop complaining about their own exploitation. You’re arguing with yourself at this point.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Being an evasive coward saying effectively nothing that you're actually committing to is just being a techbro-apologist clown at this point.

/r/futurology needs you back at the circus.

this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
124 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13894 readers
698 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS