this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
22 points (100.0% liked)

chat

8158 readers
475 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I enjoy coffee many ways. I often drink it black, but I also have been known to have it with unsweetened soy milk and usually agave/maple syrup in addition to that. However, I noticed that using both soy and a sweetener makes it taste kinda "overwhelming." This morning, I put some agave in my coffee but I put no soy, and it tastes much better. Bottom line is that I can enjoy coffee either black or with sweetener OR milk/creamer, but I can't do both sweetener and milk/creamer. Now, that I can't get with.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'll use a splash of whole milk to reduce the acidity and slightly alter the texture.

A good way to reduce acidity without adding anything to the coffee is to prepare it Chemex-style. The types of disposable filters it uses soak up a lot of the unpleasant oil-caused factors in coffee without affecting the flavour, especially the acidity.

The inventor of the Chemex was only a modest success as a chemist, but he was quite good at marketing. He gave away free Chemex sets to famous people. A sort of "bribe the influencer" strategy. For example, the reason the the fictional James Bond is a fan of Chemex-brewed coffee is because Ian Fleming was a fan, and Ian Fleming was a fan because he was gifted a set and enjoyed it.

But despite the commercial shenanigans it really is a great way to enjoy black coffee for those with sensitivities to certain oils.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

But it's not really environmentally friendly, is it? I'd imagine there isn't much way to do the same thing in a reusable form

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I use a chemex, with a re-usable cloth filter. It gives a slightly different brew, and can be a little more work to clean up, but it generates much less waste. (the cloth filters only need replacement once every 6 months or so, and are fully bio-degradable.)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you're using the filters afterwards as compost it's perfectly friendly. The entire thing is just unbleached paper and coffee grounds it'll make your garden shine

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Then what's the difference between it and drip coffee? Is it just drip coffee?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't have one but from my understanding, it's basically that but instead of having super boiling water dripping wherever in a pile of grounds and seeping through at an arbitrary rate, it's you choosing a proper lower temperature, wetting the grounds completely in a controlled manner and the coffee seeping through at a studied rate guaranteed by the shape of the design

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Well damn ok I might pick it up

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Sort of. But it involves a ton more control over every aspect letting you really bring out the flavor of the coffee. Also you tend to grind smaller so extraction takes more time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

the filters tend to be thicker, and you can control the brew temperature and process a lot more than with a drip machine, so with technique you can get more control over the strength, flavor, etc of the coffee that comes out. But its a difference of quality not of kind really, IMO.

At-home drip machines don't produce great coffee in my experience, and I think that's largely due to uneven spreading of the water over the grounds, potential over-extraction, and often too low or too high of water temperature.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Basically, yeah. But there's no heating element constantly cooking the coffee like in the average drip machine.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Its just paper cones/disks. Whatever metal or plastic mesh you might be using must have had an environmental impact being mined and manufactured. What the equivalent is in biodegradable paper disks might be hard to calculate, but if whatever you are using right now amounts to like 7 years of paper like it is for plastic bags well, the decision is yours. Some people also reuse paper filters a few times.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, the paper filters are a must for the soaking-up of oils. There's nice reusable metal filters like the Able Kone but they just filter out the grounds like any other metal filter brewing method, they do nothing to change the taste. Chemex with a Kone is just french press with extra steps.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

It's different because the grounds don't steep in coffee for several minutes, the coffee escapes seconds after being extracted. The grounds aren't pressed together either.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

soak up a lot of the unpleasant oil-caused factors in coffee

So I actually like oily coffee, I'm talking more the harshness. I cant really explain it because its so rare I drink it black.

But also I'm not messin with fancy brew methods day-to-day. I have my moka pot and french press for treats but in the morning i take approx 30 seconds to set my drip machine up and do other things.