I really think you're being inconsiderate. Advertisers lose $0.02 per non-performing word. Don't you ever consider the shareholders???

Now that's a job of the future - commandeering a Boeing AH-64E Apache to pulverise several thousand tonnes of fish trapped in a trawling net. Isn't nature beautiful?

Imagine getting a job at SpaceX thinking you're gonna build a moon base and you get put on 'Elon distraction' 😭

I'm letting the rage boil until I can no longer fight the urges to commit heinous atrocities 😎

Relatable. I've accepted I may never fall in love again.

It turns out, WE were the real deep state all along!

Religion 🤝🏻 Staunch sexism

I agree it should not be performed on a non-consenting individual, ESPECIALLY KIDS, but please do not claim the result is guaranteed to reduce sensitivity, as it is simply not true. Source: I am living proof the opposite can actually happen!

I had phimosis and experienced paraphimosis which can result in losing the whole thing. A circumcision was one of the best decisions of my adult life. It is NOT a sexual death sentence or designed to be only that. It can in fact be a saviour.

It's good but you forgot to capitalise the buzzwords: "If any LIBERALS really want HANDOUTS, maybe they can try their hands out in the MINES!" Then throw in a laughing emoji after saying something totally dangerous: "Honestly if you have democrat parents you should have to pay more for school 😂"

Yet they can't cut a promo!

Ooooopsieeees it was me 🙈

European lefty here with some questions for the anti-both crowd.

With the FPTP voting system, aren't you limited to a binary choice between Trump and Biden? I agree that Biden has been shamefully complicit in the Palestinian genocide (among broken campaign promises and rightful health concerns), though I would imagine that "finish the job" Trump would be a more destructive choice. Would it not be marginally better to have Biden in office?

I don't hold Biden in the view of someone who is a champion of environmentalism or global peace, but an anti-NATO, anti-climate science, fraudster surely would be more likely to implement harmful changes that are difficult to reverse versus a generic neoliberal?

Of course, this is through the perspective of your current voting system; ideally you would have third-party options that you could realistically elect that are not fronted by genocide supporters. In a case where you had the option for ranked choice or approval voting, who would your ideal party or candidate be?

(Not a troll/criticism post - genuinely curious about the spectrum of American politics coming into the election!)