Mm.

Probably should have led with that.

So is the argument that restricting people's creativity to only be expressed if you have the finances to do so, a good thing?

Holy strawman, Batman.

Because it is indeed literally impossible for the average person to create this without that technology.

Oh, we’ve also moved the goal posts I see.

I simply asked for a single example of something impossible to create without AI, which you have failed to provide.

You instead redefined “impossible”. Or, at least, added a bunch of qualifying words around it.

The average person can’t make a photorealistic painting. Is that “literally impossible” as well?

Hah yeah it really doesn’t, does it‽

She is Elizabeth Holmes. Convicted fraudster responsible for Therenos which promised to sell miracle blood testing kits, but actually just got a lot of investor cash and conned a lot of people. Looking at this trailer, she still seems to believe her own crazy, but who knows.

He is Nathan Fielder, I guess you’d call him a filmmaker comedian? His schtick is that he’s basically able to put people in awkward situations in a way that is frankly hard to describe for me. The Rehearsal and Nathan For You are both very very unique and hilarious, but not for everyone.

I am unreasonably excited for this movie.

https://downdetector.com/status/grindr/

Glad it’s working for you, though.

Could this be made without AI? Yes, of course it could. But it would require a HUGE budget, and an entire studio dedicated to it.

Got it. So not literally impossible.

That choice is 100% on them, then.

🙄

some can even make interesting pieces that would be *literally* impossible without it.

Got a “for instance”?

She won a Grammy for it!

https://www.dollyparton.com/news/shine-grammy-win

My god. Look at this Information Hazard just out in the open. No spoiler tag or anything.

Why try to argue against the vocabulary on this one?

Of course it’s artificial intelligence.

We’ve used “artificial intelligence” to mean everything from bots in games to Deep Blue, to protein folding and ML predictions, and those are a whole hell of a lot more specialized than llms.

Modern llms pass the Turing Test for a LOT of people.

Are there lots of problems with it as it is now? Absolutely yes. Environmental, ethical, economic, and on and on and on. All this on top of the fact that it quite bad at many many tasks. But if it’s not artificial intelligence, you’re just moving the goal posts.

100% this in corpo developer jobs.