People are getting downvoted for pointing out the obvious logical fallacy in the op too, so yeah.

Right?

I get that the tweeter wanted to just blast on religious folks, but it makes them look like they don’t have an answer.

How one determines right from wrong is a pretty interesting question with a whole lot of guess work and gut feelings for most folks, regardless of faith.

A lot of philosophers, religious or otherwise, have spilled a lot of ink on the topic.

“Threat of eternal punishment “ doesn’t help you figure out right from wrong, just the consequences of choosing “wrong.”

It would also be hilarious.

Oh 100%.

Nobody is arguing it’s not hilarious

Am I missing something, or is the point simply “I can build a computer program in a game that you may be surprised to learn is Turing complete, therefore ai is not sentient?”

I’m not here to argue that AI is sentient, but this is a really lousy argument.

Would love to see this year over year.

It may surprise you to learn that SatansMaggotyCumFart is a troll.

Vague posting master class.

Kevin?

Looks like the webmaster (do people still use that word?) is asleep at the wheel there.

Last update 266 days ago.

Was on Reddit

Source

Sorry for Reddit watermark… couldn’t quickly find it elsewhere.