So is the argument that restricting people's creativity to only be expressed if you have the finances to do so, a good thing?

Holy strawman, Batman.

Because it is indeed literally impossible for the average person to create this without that technology.

Oh, we’ve also moved the goal posts I see.

I simply asked for a single example of something impossible to create without AI, which you have failed to provide.

You instead redefined “impossible”. Or, at least, added a bunch of qualifying words around it.

The average person can’t make a photorealistic painting. Is that “literally impossible” as well?

it's literally impossible for the average person to become an expert at my instrument (for three more months) because my instrument costs like six figures. i have literally met three people my entire life with one, and they don't specialize in it the way i do.

i'm publishing the plans for an effective practice instrument that costs $300 in about three months.

i don't plan on charging, because people are going to get so good at my instrument. i'm currently one of the best in the world but they'll be able to blow me out of the water in five years with good practice. I'm so excited to see what people will be able to do.