top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 269 points 3 weeks ago (30 children)

I bet this is because LLMs stole her art for training, so now that the LLM users have pumped out thousands of slop-art aping hers down to the colour palate and brushstrokes, her originals also get identified as also AI.

  • source
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • [–] 105 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    This is exactly it. Also the reason that inputting an excerpt of a classical text (cfr. Dracula, Frankenstein, ...) returns "likely AI" results - it's literally what it was trained on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • But the fact that they say their system is "advanced" and "refined", while they don't even add some guardrails as, i.e., date checks, that are the minimum one would expect to be added to reduce the likeliness of both false positives and false negatives. It's just stunning.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 43 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

    While I don't think you're entirely wrong, I feel like this sentiment will lead people to believing AI content checkers more. The content checkers are wrong even for newer stuff. I always default to believing something is human made because I never want to accuse a real artist for using AI.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    I don't follow, if content checkers are wrong for not being able to tell original art from AI slop because they have been trained on datasets that include the original art, why wouldn't they also be wrong for the same reason on newer art? They would still likely absorb that newer art into their datasets.

    Okay after writing it out I get what you mean, but I am thinking that the turnaround time of absorbing new art, using it to produce AI slop requests a few dozen/hundred/million times, and then calling the original works AI because the AI sloptificator can no longer tell the difference will be a constant, unless there is some way to track OC across multiple AI agents in the panslopticon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (18 replies)
    [–] 99 points 3 weeks ago (40 children)

    The back edge of generated content that I don't see a lot of discussion about is mislabeling real content, accidentally or not. It's gonna have a monumental affect on how we consume media, even for those that want to avoid it.

  • source
  • hideshow 40 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 3 weeks ago* (15 children)

    Yep, this is the most important threat of Gen AI in my opinion. The erosion of trust, and the following devaluation of truth, is already hurting society so much. And it will only get worse.

    Remember, it’s not just «did someone actually paint this?». It is also «did this actually happen?» and «did they actually say that?».

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

    A promotional image I created for a local queer rally was deemed "AI" by the community (the image was actually the result of me sacrificing 8 hours of sleep.) The vitriol I was hit with, including one of my fellow committee members passive aggressively implying I was lying about it not being AI, was enough to make me no longer want to volunteer my time or skills for my own community.

    Which is really fucking shitty. The increased lateral attacks happening because of Gen-AI pitting us against one another benefits those fucks at the top, and they didn't even have to work for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 weeks ago

    +1. I was releasing free fucking music for indie devs who didn't have budget or limited budget for this kinda stuff, some mf on reddit who was selling his music saw this, contacted admins to claim it was made via AI, then they took the post down without doing any investigation or even contacting me. Labeled as made with AI. I've worked in the industry for over 10 years, there's literally 0 reason for me to use AI to make music lol From that point onward I just pulled out all of my free libraries from public, if it's that easy to mislabel somebody's hard work, and only give the download codes for free for people who did contact me personally and that I was sure they were actually building something.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (22 replies)
    [–] 67 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    The stated goal is that we won't be able to tell the difference.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 52 points 3 weeks ago

    This is also entirely intentional.

  • source
  • [–] 35 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

    Really sucks this ruined everything. I have no motivation for art or music because anything made in this era is suspect now and no one has any integrity. Why even release music when people probably won't even listen to something that new. Should have stopped in 2012 boys.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Artist here. I don't draw because I'm good at it. Or because other people are better at it than me.

    I do it because I like it. A lot.

    It makes me happy to be able to take something from my own brain and make it real enough that others can see it. I don't want to make a career out of it or anything. But being able to draw things for my friends for Christmas or birthdays is something that makes them happy. Drawing my own assets for games I'm programming, or sketching dumb stickers for friend group in-jokes on Discord is satisfying.

    Please keep drawing. Please keep making music. You don't have to make anybody happy other than yourself. It's as normal an expression of humanity as dancing or singing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 12 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    Honest question, but is your only goal for for example music to put it online? I play music, an obvious goal of it is to play it for other people, and what does AI matter? They see me play the instrument and that's the problem solved.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 weeks ago*

    Yep. One of my finest moments as a musician was last year. Guy comes up to me after a show and says something like “gosh, I feel bad for you musicians, AI is taking your job.” I was just like “do you think I do this for money? I have a day job. I play music to meet and impress women, and you’ll never be able to do that with AI.”

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 34 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    This is likely on purpose. The goal is to normalize AI and make people feel like "everyone uses ai".

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 34 points 3 weeks ago*

    People are using AI to determine what is or is not AI so that they can avoid AI

    This is funny

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 3 weeks ago

    I had never heard of the artist before, and if you haven't either, I cannot recommend giving her website a visit enough.

    Insanely talented and really unique style.

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Want to know what this tells me? The image is likely already in the training data.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 28 points 3 weeks ago

    Wait until for them to close your account with the pretext of "your account has violated our community guidelines", no legal justification whatsoever if some people decide to spam that report button lol stop using these bullshit platforms that see you as nothing but a number. Hell, you might be earning your life through Instagram or YouTube, and all it takes for them to delete your years of content is pressing one button.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    I lived through the birth and widespread adoption of the Internet and it’s becoming increasingly likely I’ll live through its death, too. You don’t realise you were in the good old days until they’re over.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 19 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    My friend has been posting stories of the meals he cooks. They all get labeled as made with AI...

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 19 points 3 weeks ago (23 children)

    if only there were platforms you could migrate to that wouldnt have this problem

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 3 weeks ago (15 children)

    This doesn't work for artists who need to make a living. The art-buying audience is not on the platforms you are talking about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

    Instagram also needs to "make a living". They do that by making your life as an artist harder. You have to make a choice between using software that respects you and having a smaller following, or using a platform that, in every way that you can imagine, is abusing you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 19 points 3 weeks ago

    full reality distortion ... this tech is coming at a cost none of us can afford.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 3 weeks ago* (2 children)

    Literal fucking nightmare

    Makes me want to never release anything ever again

    (I'm not on Meta. I mean anywhere)

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

    I think this labeling was probably done by AI.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 weeks ago* (3 children)

    Lots of “AI detector” tools for both images and text are AI, yes. People using them don’t realize the irony because everyone wants so badly to believe there’s a way to stop all the AI fakers.

    edit: please, someone come up with an actually reliable way to detect AI art, something that’s not based on probabilities that will be skewed by real artists having their art used to train AI

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Last time, someone on Lemmy posted a chapter by a 1800 poet and author, and it was labelled AI.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›