So is the argument that restricting people's creativity to only be expressed if you have the finances to do so, a good thing?

Holy strawman, Batman.

Because it is indeed literally impossible for the average person to create this without that technology.

Oh, we’ve also moved the goal posts I see.

I simply asked for a single example of something impossible to create without AI, which you have failed to provide.

You instead redefined “impossible”. Or, at least, added a bunch of qualifying words around it.

The average person can’t make a photorealistic painting. Is that “literally impossible” as well?