[-] [email protected] 46 points 4 months ago

The Nixon-era Richardson Waiver came about amid a push for more public engagement, with the waiver acting essentially as a workaround to amending the APA's exemptions. As Richard Brady, the assistant secretary for administration, wrote in the Federal Register at the time, implementing the Richardson Waiver "should result in greater participation by the public in the formulation of this Department's rules and regulations."

"The public benefit from such participation should outweigh any administrative inconvenience or delay which may result from use of the APA procedures in the five exempt categories," Brady wrote. The waiver also noted that the Health Department should use the "good cause" exception "sparingly."

Kennedy's new policy rescinds the Richardson Waiver entirely. He writes in stark contrast: "The extra-statutory obligations of the Richardson Waiver impose costs on the Department and the public, are contrary to the efficient operation of the Department, and impede the Department's flexibility to adapt quickly to legal and policy mandates."

So, just to make this clear, they didn't just not really implement their fabled transparency, they also walked back on the control mechanisms that were already in place.

1
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
126
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
7
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
0
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 43 points 4 months ago

Oh, neat, I remember borrowing money from friends to buy one shortly after release, and spending many months repaying it. My main thought process, besides it being a cool PC, was "the higher the statistics, the better the outlook for Linux adoption". :D

Can barely believe it's been three years already.

1
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Von der Karte hier: https://www.tagesschau.de/wahl/archiv/2025-02-23-BT-DE/index.shtml

Hier exemplarisch mal einen, Schwerbach, SPD bei nicht mal 3%, Grüne bei über 30, Linke auch bei über 10, was genau ist in so einer Gemeinde wohl die letzten Jahre passiert, was anderswo gefehlt hat?

So beim Scannen der Karte fällt mir zumindest auf: AfD hat nirgendwo wirklich komplett versagt, anscheinend ist der harte Kern einfach von der lokalen Realität losgelöst.

9
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
36
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
131
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 52 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This just as a reminder: Even if this is to turn out to really 100% be a suicide, that just means they were able to silence him by driving him into suicide - basically by all important metrics the same as a corporate assassination with extra steps.

[-] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago

It's a very common gut reaction to assume something like this has to be "staged", I said it in the other thread in some discussions: It's understandable to have it as this feeling. But everyone who feels that way: take a breath, remember the world is much more chaotic and much less controlled than you think, you don't have to think of yourself as stupid for thinking it, but wait for more information to come out and be ready to give it up then.

Reacting properly to this new reality is much more important, than trying to adjust reality to fit an emotion. It's human to do that, react instinctively in a first gut reaction, but it is also human to be able to let go of that.

[-] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago

In the short term, I am expecting right-wing nutjobs to do their own sort of retaliatory shootings, targeting whomever their personal info bubble blames as a group.

[-] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago

Isn't this one really obvious? They are selling toupées for your butt and accidentally added a "W". Not confusing in the slightest, really.

[-] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago

You know, as much as one has to keep Machiavellian machinations and Realpolitik in mind.... Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. Biden did not do well. They report about it in a way that gives them clicks. There is no plan.

[-] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago

We must imagine Sisyphus in therapy

[-] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago

Without justifying this really dumb act, because there’s no justifying it, [...]
How about we just don’t vandalize private property. That’s a good standpoint to build on.

Wow, how unbased can an article get?

[-] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Every source on the history of Google seems to ~~implicate~~ imply that their growth and development went:

Using their university resources -> surviving off of investor money -> starting monetization with targeted ads and raking in money

So it seems they had a phase of cornering their market with both public resources and off risky investments, then capitalised on having that exclusive appeal. Seems all too familiar, considering every damn tech startup under the sun now seems to go "trick investors or public funds" -> "corner market" -> "enshittifcation"

If someone else has some better info - go ahead and correct me, but there seems to be no mention of monetisation of Google before their targeted ad rollout.

[-] [email protected] 42 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Nope, after reading the article, it seems she was a student destined to be used for PR by the school and probably also for sucking up to donors. No humanity allowed, twerking is of the devil and such stuff.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Wxnzxn

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 4 years ago