Rashav3rak

joined 4 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

good to know, I realize now it's been quite a few years since I've used it and I didn't know that

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

The best way to see them all for free is annualcreditreport.com. It's jointly operated by Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion to comply with some federal law that says they each have to give you a free report every year. You only get one of each annually, so if you want to keep tabs on your credit more frequently you can get one now from Experian, wait four months, get one from Equifax, wait four months, get one from TransUnion and repeat.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago (2 children)

To be clear, this is the app you'd use on a macbook or imac or whatever they call their desktop computers these days. It's not the app for iphone or ipad

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

To me, Biden seemed certain to lose, while with Kamala it could go either way. In no way is she a worse candidate than Biden. I think we should all be deeply invested in Kamala winning the election. Not because I want to see Trump lose, though I do. Not because I want to see Kamala win, which I don't really. What I want, what I think we all want, is to see Hillary Clinton looking on as another woman becomes the first woman president. Not just that, I want to see Kamala win easily, just to make it clear to Hillary that she, personally, was the problem in 2016. No one thinks Kamala is an impressive candidate, so if her mediocre ass beats Trump with a comfortable margin, it'll more or less settle the argument as to who was responsible for Trump's victory.

To be clear, I haven't lost sight of the fact that a Harris presidency would basically just be the Biden presidency with more awkward laughter. We're not going to get a good president this time around, or maybe ever. I'm aware that I'm doing something similar to the republican rank-and-file who know their candidates won't do anything to help them, but will at least make the people they don't like suffer. We should all be protesting, agitating, and organizing for something better, but with the understanding that organizing is almost certainly not getting us a better candidate this cycle, let's try and find joy where we can. In this case, in schadenfreude.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (4 children)

and here I was thinking the joke was to give them literal maids or maidens or something

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (3 children)

he apparently posted this from the hospital after a seizure, according to his wife

https://x.com/ambercrollo/status/1812866538397139334

sorry for the twitter link i don't know how to use the alternatives

[–] [email protected] 37 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I mean, he's right. We just let them do it. If he'd like us to take matters into our own hands I'm sure we can oblige.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I love that I put on a white noise video to help me sleep and now my feed is 80% white noise videos

[–] [email protected] 43 points 8 months ago (6 children)

I got to do this once. I look like the type a prosecutor would probably want on a jury and I wasn't individually asked any questions before being chosen. The case was a non-violent drug offense and it was a wild experience for reasons I won't get into. Once we got in the jury room it pretty much went like:

"Not guilty."

"Why not guilty? It's a pretty clear cut case."

"I don't believe the cops."

"Why don't you believe the cops?"

"I didn't find their testimony credible. It didn't convince me beyond a reasonable doubt."

"What about the body cam footage? Do you believe that?"

"I didn't find it convincing."

"The whole thing is on camera, do you think they faked it all?"

"I suppose that's a possibility. I just haven't seen enough evidence to convict."

"What more evidence could you need?"

"More than this. I'm not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt."

And around and around we went like that. I was the lone holdout. I have to say, the other jurors were pretty cool about it. Eventually we had to tell the judge we couldn't reach a verdict on any of the charges and it was declared a mistrial. Totally worth it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I want to work at the government Office of Whaddya-Need? where people come because they need help training their dog, or they need help moving across the country, or they need a leaking roof patched up, or they need someone to pick their kid up from soccer practice on Friday evenings, or they want to become a librarian and need career guidance, or they have limited mobility and just want someone to take them over to the lake and sit and chat. I want to be the person who helps to figure out how to get them the thing they need. For free of course, because it's a communist utopia.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

As someone who has never cared about Batman or any other superhero but enjoyed all the Arkham games, I think it's worth it for the Gotham-at-Christmas atmosphere. I often replay it around Christmastime

 

I'm not one to get into a F2P online competitive shooter, but The Finals has hooked me. I used to play a lot of TF2 and L4D vs mode back in the day, but nothing since then has looked like anything I'm interested in playing. Never played any CoD, Battlefield, Overwatch, Destiny, PUBG, Fortnite, Apex Legends, never had any interest. I guess actually I did play Fall Guys for a hot second and it was fun but the novelty wore off quickly and it's not really the same genre. All that is to say I have very little to compare to The Finals.

I only picked it up because environmental destruction in games is interesting to me, and The Finals is free so there was no barrier to entry. I just wanted to check out the destruction mechanics. Now it's the first game I reach for in my free time. Like I said, I don't have the experience or the language to discuss the finer points of the game's balance or whatever and frankly I don't give a shit because I'm having fun. I was playing the new event they have going on and it was so satisfying to know that I could access the heavily guarded cashout station on the floor above me by destroying the ceiling to bring it down to my floor. I'm aware this isn't the first multiplayer shooter to make destruction part of the game, but the way entire buildings can be brought down is so cool and something I haven't seen since maybe the Red Faction games. The other day I got matched with a pair of sledgehammer heavy teammates who didn't even try to win and just ran around leveling the map. We ended up almost winning anyway because they caused so much chaos that the other teams couldn't easily get to the vaults and cashout stations. I love that even when you're not very good at the game (and I'm not) you can just try to create enough chaos that you give your teammates an opening.

Gotta say though, this is my first direct experience with games that have seasons and battle passes and it's wild how manipulative it is. You can see exactly how it's engineered to create FOMO and to keep you from being able to calculate the real monetary value of anything you're buying. Everyone who has been around this block is like "yeah that's how it works" and I follow the industry enough to be familiar with these practices, but it's still kind of shocking. I haven't spent a dime on the game yet, and I may never. We'll see how far I get on the battle pass as a casual player before season 1 ends. I'm not going to be beholden to a game that feels like a job.

Other things I like:

There doesn't appear to be any text chat and voice chat is off by default. You better believe I leave that shit turned off, and the players I get matched with probably hate me for it, but they'll just have to scream into the void. I try to be a good teammate though and use the gestures or indicators or whatever to communicate where I'm going or where enemies are.

Even with the manipulative monetization, there's no way to buy weapons or equipment with real money. Everything that affects gameplay is unlocked by playing the game. We'll see how long that lasts.

Technical performance is generally good.

Interesting aesthetic, lovely environments, cool music.

So anyone else playing it? What's the consensus?

 

Found out we're doing a mandatory active-shooter training at work. It'll be "non interactive" which I guess means no fake guns or practice takedowns or whatever they do to scare people. At least one of my coworkers has already expressed adamant opposition to this, so I have at least one ally. I'd be more opposed if I were going to have fake guns pointed at me, but if it's just sitting in a room listening to someone talk, I don't mind being paid to listen to their bullshit. Anyway, beyond what I've said, I don't know much about these trainings, so what are some funny ways I could derail it? Don't hold back

 
view more: next ›