What I found really funny was someone commenting about Albania's rate one time was like "now do the percentage under 30 years old" and it's just like...2026-30...hmm 1996, I wonder if anything happened around that decade that might have changed anything
Justice Dept. Drops Claim That Venezuela’s ‘Cartel de los Soles’ Is an Actual Group - The New York Times https://share.google/mMPXXcpH9JUOyvfWB
[This won't change anything but like...yeah, no shit Sherlock]
-
On second thought, perhaps he shouldn't be placed as a "Maoist." Honestly he's very vague on what his ideological throughline is, but it's not Maoism.
-
He's not the worst person ever, I should point out. I wouldn't trust him too much, but he's certainly better than a lot of people
-
1dime is a bit of an idealist sometimes [which might explain the lack of ideological throughline.] For example, his video on the cultural revolution handwaved away explanations about how certain structures would be good beyond them sounding socialist.
-
He tries to do that thing that western leftists do where they try to make a direct ideological connection between enlightenment thinkers [Nietchze, Voltaire, etc.] And marxist ones [directly or indirectly saying marxism is a continuation of the enlightenment]. This, in my opinion at least, is a very baby leftist take that I struggled with in my first years. It's not a horrible thing to think necessarily, but 1dime has obviously been a marxist for longer than I have, so it's concerning he is making what is quite literally a Vaush level take at this point.
5.Speaking of Vaush level takes, he believes China is imperialist and capitalist, says there's a genocide(?) In xinjiang and that the CPC is using "Bush Era tactics" on Uygers [I for one wish I got the same treatment as Uygers in China, considering they have gotten more prosperous], constantly plainly throws out bangers like "Stalin had dictatorial power and called all of his opponents Kulaks" (note: he doesn't actually try to argue this, he simply throws this out as a truism. This is one of the reasons i get a little angry with him, as truisims like that are my least favorite form of argumentation), and other such things you can find on his Twitter and videos and such.
I think he's less Hasan and more black redguard/onedime. He's not going "ohh we don't like Maduro cause otherwise liberals will dismiss us." Hes just a Maoist.
I stopped taking his modern views seriously after his stuff with Syria.
I think honestly him and a lot of people who do work like him are just...stuck in the past. It sucks, honestly, because of how important connecting those topics of history to present day circumstances is. But unfortunately people like him, onedime, just get stuck back there for some goddamn reason.
[Note: twchnically was a social democrat, but i dont really care seperating soc-dems from dem-socs] I was really, really bad for a while. Like "no country should be trading with China or Russia" bad. Like "supports israel" bad.
For me it was A. The disparity between the socialist response to covid to the rest of the capitalist world and B.Radicalization from learning about the Iraq War.
I lost a family member to covid, and when that million death toll rolled around, i was incensed. I was even more incensed because I warned everyone in my life and online about the disease, and i got the ever so often "don't worry about it, it's just the cold." I essentially watched in reverance as China managed to do a full response while being a much more densely populated country and being where the outbreak originated from.
The Iraq War was another one. For me, Vietnam was bad, but that was just "bad strategy." I still saw it as legitimate (obviously I don't believe that now). Iraq was always "the war." It wasn't taught in schools, I didn't even know any vets from the war. I knew we invaded Iraq, but I didn't get why it was so controversial. I was looking at it and wondering, since the intial engagement didn't actually last that long [unlike Vietnam, kind of. Obviously there were the Iraqi insurgents]. One day i finally looked into it and it essentially shattered me. So much death and destruction for what is basically money for people who already had money. And no one got punished for it. At that moment I basically vowed that I wouldn't believe anything the media or western stooges put in front of me. Of course this led to some embarrassment [a la, Sadam Huissein and Pol Pot support], but after some ideological ironing it helped smooth out those wrinkles.
Note: I had an inkling of a sense of political economy. At one point i even remember grumbling to myself like "why do the corporations get to have all this power and get rid of jobs and dwvelop/impoverish places based on tax policies, but the workers have to put up with it?" That was way before the events mentioned above, i just find it funny looking back on it
replaces male president with female one
charges maduro with fire arm possession
Is trump secretly part of the woke liberal elite? Is he engaging in DEI programs abroad?
"Yeah they messed up the legal case, now they'll never get him"
Jeffery Epstein looking up from hell:
Doesn't that also fall under the category of try? Maybe the gulf war could be argued, but they got what they wanted out of it [and the war basically only ended by technicalities. It was more like there was a decade long "truce" where America got to starve Iraqis via sanctions]
Edit: but I do wanna say that I'm not expecting this to be the end of it. Obviously. I'm more just curious what the original plan was, because i can't understand what said plan was.
Ehhh, what's more normal is to actually try? Like obviously Vietnam failed, but they tried [understatement i know]. Panama was arguably a success given what the goals were. This time...the goals are simultaneously super specific but also stupid vague
I find it interesting how there were [and still are] many parallels between Chinese and Japanese business cultures since the reform and opening up began. But China changes [for the better] while Japan has reamined mostly the same, even with the coming and going of generations and economic boons and, mostly, busts.
Marat
0 post score0 comment score





This isn't the entire problem, obviously, but this is why I don't use Twitter [beyond the garbage ui]. It's basically what happens when you give people a way to say intrusive thoughts completely seriously.
This type of thing isn't something ive thought specifically, but I've had plenty of bad takes in my head that I didn't spread to an audience with 100% confidence. [For example: Having very strong opinions on the Turkish-Greek conflicts (despite being from neither country). Luckily beyond just disliking Rome and some snide remarks about how much I love that Ataturk renamed Constantinople, i didn't say anything]. I'm sure there's plenty of well meaning people who might have had similar thoughts to Yugo here, but didn't say them.
The other issue is that Yugo should be better than this. It's like what I said about 1dime recently. If this was a baby leftist then I'd be concerned but the thought would probably just be an impulsive thing that's easily corrected. Yugo has an audience of thousands and should be well developed, ergo this thought is more concerning in him than anonympus user "libdestroyer9000"
Edit: more seriously, what's the explanation for this? Taking this argument seriously has its own problems sure, but like...what biological factor would be at play here? Why would one place act like this and another not? Beyond just "stupid people." Which definitely isn't ableist at all