73

Only a 6 minute video and he managed to fit in:

  • Chavez and Maduro betraying the revolution and not building socialism,
  • Maduro outlawing "the actual communists",
  • Venezuela supposedly never took any serious steps to diversify its economy from oil,
  • Russian and Chinese imperialism,
  • Some big bourgeoisie are "puppets of China and Russia",
  • Russian imperialism in Ukraine,
  • China debt-trapping Venezuela.

His conclusion: "we should not advocate for return of Maduro to power".

He also managed to confuse the separate events of the US striking the fishing boats and the US pirating the oil tankers arriving at "these boats were supposedly transporting drugs while many were in reality obviously oil tankers going to Cuba" as if he didn't pay any attention before and did some last-minute research before making the video.

all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] durduramayacaklar@lemmygrad.ml 43 points 1 month ago

I'm tired of typing “another huge L for Western Marxist”

[-] Saymaz@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 1 month ago

Your biggest mistake was trusting a western leftist. Same with Torkil Lauessen, no matter how much Hakim likes him.

[-] durduramayacaklar@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I wasn't watching him. What's wrong with the Torkil Lauesen? I don't know him but Hakim recommended his books and was planning to read them.

[-] muad_dibber@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 month ago
[-] durduramayacaklar@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 4 weeks ago

Thanks a lot! Comrade Hakim recommend me that book and I'm happy to discard it from my list!

[-] pcalau12i@lemmygrad.ml 38 points 1 month ago

My biggest criticism was the whole

[they] never took any serious steps to establish a proletarian power or socialism

He doesn't address the steps they took and show why they were not "serious" to him, he just claims they aren't.

Not only did Chavez nationalize many industries, but he established communal councils throughout the country. These communal councils receive funds from the state enterprises and the right to decide how to distribute them into the community. They are also armed.

This significantly extends proletarian power because it means that Venezuela's government is not just the party but an enormous network of armed communal councils throughout the country that directly have material interests in supporting the government and the state-owned enterprises because they directly receive financial support from the government.

That is something people often miss in the propaganda that paints Venezuela as if it was entirely ran by Maduro personally. If you topple the president, PSUV will just elect a new president. If you topple PSUV, then now you will still have to deal with the sea of communal councils throughout the whole country that are all armed and aligned with Chavismo.

Maduro also did a good job in consolidating power on the national level as well, something Chavez did not accomplish before he died and is where Allende failed. Allende also expanded grassroots participation with his industrial belts, but did not consolidate power on the national level so he was constantly fighting with the other parties and eventually overthrown. The fact Maduro got through maybe the most difficult step we would expect from a reformist approach is very impressive.

I am sure there are economic criticisms we can make of them like the economy not being great and not being diverse enough, but given they are under brutal sanctions it is hard to really expect much. The claim that not achieving wealth or diversity is proof a country is not socialist is also the same argument Maoists use against Cuba, but it's just a bad argument because diversifying is hard without a lot of money and external investments which sanctioned countries don't have access to.

[-] burlemarx@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I am sure there are economic criticisms we can make of them like the economy not being great and not being diverse enough, but given they are under brutal sanctions it is hard to really expect much. The claim that not achieving wealth or diversity is proof a country is not socialist is also the same argument Maoists use against Cuba, but it's just a bad argument because diversifying is hard without a lot of money and external investments which sanctioned countries don't have access to.

Venezuela did diversify. For example, its communes developed agricultural cooperatives in order to achieve food self-sufficiency. However more complex industries like pharmaceuticals, green energy, automobiles, etc can't be built overnight. We are not talking about 19th century standards of industry, 21st century industry is infinitely more complex. Venezuela didn't have an opportunity to absorb Western tech like China did.

[-] rainpizza@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 4 weeks ago

What a great comment! Thank you for investigating Venezuela and for describing the enormous achievements of the Venezuelan gov't.

[-] cornishon@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

The claim that not achieving wealth or diversity is proof a country is not socialist is also the same argument Maoists use against Cuba

But of course, if you do achieve wealth and diversity, it's because you betrayed the Revolution and became capitalist. It's Parenti's unfalsifiable orthodoxy, but applied in reverse.

[-] demerit@lemmygrad.ml 30 points 1 month ago

Insane how one of the better leftist YouTubers just went hasan mode. I had watched him for like 10+ years. Anyways sadly its the norm in euroleft circles.

[-] Marat@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 1 month ago

I think he's less Hasan and more black redguard/onedime. He's not going "ohh we don't like Maduro cause otherwise liberals will dismiss us." Hes just a Maoist.

[-] cornishon@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 1 month ago

Yep, I find bringing up Hasan Here quite weird. Not to make it a Hasan struggle session, but I'm pretty sure he has the more correct position on every single of the points.

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 1 month ago

Anyways sadly its the norm in euroleft circles.

Sadly true. Probably exacerbated by the fact that it's Finland... Even the communists in Finland can't fully escape the liberal brainworms.

[-] Saymaz@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 4 weeks ago

Losurdo being right once again.

[-] ArcticFoxSmiles@lemmygrad.ml 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I stop watching him awhile when I hear he mentioned Russian imperialism. I also used to watch him a good amount.

[-] Marat@lemmygrad.ml 27 points 1 month ago

I stopped taking his modern views seriously after his stuff with Syria.

I think honestly him and a lot of people who do work like him are just...stuck in the past. It sucks, honestly, because of how important connecting those topics of history to present day circumstances is. But unfortunately people like him, onedime, just get stuck back there for some goddamn reason.

[-] pyromaiden@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 month ago

Wait, what's wrong with 1Dime?

[-] Marat@lemmygrad.ml 24 points 1 month ago
  1. On second thought, perhaps he shouldn't be placed as a "Maoist." Honestly he's very vague on what his ideological throughline is, but it's not Maoism.

  2. He's not the worst person ever, I should point out. I wouldn't trust him too much, but he's certainly better than a lot of people

  3. 1dime is a bit of an idealist sometimes [which might explain the lack of ideological throughline.] For example, his video on the cultural revolution handwaved away explanations about how certain structures would be good beyond them sounding socialist.

  4. He tries to do that thing that western leftists do where they try to make a direct ideological connection between enlightenment thinkers [Nietchze, Voltaire, etc.] And marxist ones [directly or indirectly saying marxism is a continuation of the enlightenment]. This, in my opinion at least, is a very baby leftist take that I struggled with in my first years. It's not a horrible thing to think necessarily, but 1dime has obviously been a marxist for longer than I have, so it's concerning he is making what is quite literally a Vaush level take at this point.

5.Speaking of Vaush level takes, he believes China is imperialist and capitalist, says there's a genocide(?) In xinjiang and that the CPC is using "Bush Era tactics" on Uygers [I for one wish I got the same treatment as Uygers in China, considering they have gotten more prosperous], constantly plainly throws out bangers like "Stalin had dictatorial power and called all of his opponents Kulaks" (note: he doesn't actually try to argue this, he simply throws this out as a truism. This is one of the reasons i get a little angry with him, as truisims like that are my least favorite form of argumentation), and other such things you can find on his Twitter and videos and such.

[-] vaguevoid@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

and that the CPC is using “Bush Era tactics” on Uygers

what?? vocational schools aren’t “bush era tactics.” bush era tactics are massacring civilians and invading and decimating countries.

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago

Check out his most recent video. Its really something

[-] Jarmund@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 4 weeks ago

I watched that video and it's a fucking joke; the guy seems it has something against the deprogram and co.

[-] Malkhodr@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 4 weeks ago

Which is kinda funny considering he appeared on the podcast. I remember making a post about his Chinese Cultural Revolution video back on TheDeprogram subreddit. The discussion was small but relatively insightful.

His whole "anti-stalinist" schtick just comes off as someone fighting shadow puppets to me.

[-] TankieReplyBot@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 month ago

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

[-] Kultronx@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 4 weeks ago

Lots of bad takes imo. On a recent podcast he said something along the lines of "BLM was just an excuse for people to break stuff" with no pushback from his guest.

[-] pcalau12i@lemmygrad.ml 24 points 4 weeks ago

Update: I had a brief interaction with Finbol. He not only views Venezuela and China as capitalist, but even Cuba as well, which he linked me to Maoist articles to argue why. He's definitely gone off the deep end into ultraleftism. I initially was inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt but after realizing he even claims Cuba is capitalist I realize he has definitely too far gone.

[-] MasterDeeLuke@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

It's mindboggling. Even if China and all those countries are indeed the most capitalist countries in the world, they are not the ones actively engaged in an open global crusade against anything and anyone leftist to the point of invading countries left and right. It would be like arguing that the USSR should declare war on the Western capitalist powers during the middle of Operation Barbarossa, and that's with granting the ultras such a comparison.

[-] o_d@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 4 weeks ago

Just saying 🤷

[-] redparadise@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 1 month ago

Umm no idea who that guy is but the shit he's saying might be insulting to leftcoms.

[-] DonLongSchlong@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 1 month ago
[-] comrade_sverdlov@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 4 weeks ago

What is happening to Western Marxist? As if, we went back to cold war times to repeat the western marxism rhetoric

[-] pyromaiden@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 4 weeks ago

For every Second Thought there are 50 Vaushs.

Sad, but true. It's an uphill battle in the West more than anywhere else.

[-] comrade_sverdlov@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 4 weeks ago

In the Global south Marxism they're not have to deal with this. They're not buying Trots and libshit arguments since they're not benefiting from the system. But, this creates a reactionaries and patsoc movements.

[-] TankieReplyBot@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 month ago

I found a YouTube link in your post. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
73 points (98.7% liked)

GenZedong

5054 readers
103 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

See this GitHub page for a collection of sources about socialism, imperialism, and other relevant topics.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS