Two different webs very close together. I like to imagine they'd chat about their days of they could!
Like some distraction tactic from all the real shit that is happening.
Like the genocide? Idk, this feels related to the genocide.
Mm, so the only thing that can make something original is the playable factions. Noted. Indeed a weird hill to die on.
10k? Well that's pretty original, because I've never heard of it.
But on a more serious note, it's just too reductive to say "there is nothing original in StarCraft because it feels like Warhammer 40k." All media is inspired by media that came before it. Lion King is similar to Hamlet, does that mean there's nothing original in it?
Yeah, it sort of depends on the definition of the word file. "File" in the sense that it can be interacted with like a file versus "file" in the sense that it's data on a disk. But then, if you're really thinking about it, data on a disk isn't a file, it's data, and we can just interact with it like a file.
I think a lot of those bodies just end up getting used for target practice essentially... Or to test weapons.
Don't sell your Bitcoin yet.
Nobody ignored it, we saw it, chuckled, and continued.
People do this shit all the time. In that infamous meme showing Ariana Grande getting darker skinned they did the same thing.
It feels pretty reductive to say something doesn't have original ideas. Pretty much every story has been told in one way or another at this point in history, especially if we get really reductive about it. It doesn't mean things can't be interesting or unique.
It makes more sense when you realize that it's not that everything is files it's that everything can be treated as a file. There are other APIs to interact with things, but everything can be interacted with as if it was a file. It doesn't seem as bonkers like this.
Like a lot of memes, they exaggerate for humor. This meme was originally about math.
Thanks! It's none of those, unfortunately. But you did get me closer. The character's name is Martinez, I think. Based on one of these. It was very long, I remember that. Like you definitely had to scroll to see it all (and that was on a monitor too).
Make IntelliJ IDEA warn for potential NullPointerExceptions during unboxing without assuming everything is @Nullable?
(stackoverflow.com)
Link to a (frustratingly) deleted question on Stack Overflow. Text and image copied below incase you don't have the ability to see it. (Not sure why the image shows multiple times.)
Is there any way to more granularly control IntelliJ IDEA's inspections' "Nullability and data flow problems" option "Treat non-annotated members and parameters as @Nullable"? Preferably for unboxing specifically?
I am aware I can use a variety of @Nullable annotations in a variety of places in the code to make the warnings appear. That's not always an option as the place the boxed primitives are coming from may be other libraries you don't have control over. (Imagine if the Holder record below was from a different project.) I included other examples below to illustrate my point.
public class Sample {
private final Boolean value;
public Sample(Boolean value) {
this.value = value;
}
private boolean isValue() {
return value; // I would like a warning here
}
private static Boolean boxedTrue() {
return true;
}
private static boolean unboxedTrue() {
return boxedTrue(); // No warning here, but that's understandable since never null
}
private static Boolean boxedNull() {
return null;
}
private static boolean unboxedNull() {
return boxedNull(); // Only warning in the file (by default)
// "Unboxing of 'boxedNull()' may produce 'NullPointerException'
}
public record Holder(Boolean value) {}
public boolean openHolder(Holder holder) {
return holder.value(); // I would like a warning here
}
}
When "Treat non-annotated members and parameters as @Nullable" is enabled, the following gives warnings. While that makes sense given the name of the option, there is code like this literally everywhere. It adds hundreds of warnings to my project. I'm trying to find more granular choices.
public static ZonedDateTime timeStuff(LocalDateTime localDateTime, ZoneId zoneId) {
return localDateTime.atZone(zoneId); // I do not want warnings for this
}
I see that the Java Class Library has JetBrains annotations despite not actually being annotated. Is there perhaps some way to add these automatically to libraries if there is no better way to control the inspection?
Literally. I open up my terminal and try to cd Desktop only to be told that no such file exists. I thought for sure everyone this was happening to was just not reading something correctly and were foolish. Nope! It literally began deleting my files.
Edit 2: Even once it's done and you have them locally and not "on demand", the Desktop is in
~/OneDrive/Desktopinstead of~/Desktop. See this helpful comment.
It looks like there might be a way to sort of disable Files on Demand but it looks like it won't let me do it until it's done uploading? I'll post updates.
Not to be dramatic, but I'm really going through it. My mouse logitech mouse is suddenly chattering really bad and double clicking everything. Also while Steam refuses to let me disable auto updates for all games in any sort of easy way. And DDG seems intent on only showing me results related to launching games without updating (as opposed to merely disabling auto updates until I launch). The chatter fixer I found for my mouse does not work and the other requires some logitech program to even try to use. (The repo doesn't mention the name.) This is awful. When it rains it pours, I guess. Literally can't even high light this text to wrap it in a spoiler. This is fucking stupid.
Context: My parents have a family plan for Microsoft 365 they added me too and it has 1 TB of storage I can use. I wouldn't have turned it on otherwise.
Edit: My desktop background has literally vanished and turned solid black.
DO NOT ENABLE ONE DRIVE.
Fuck it, .zshrc it is.
Image transcription:
- Top text: I STILL DON'T KNOW WHAT SHOULD GO IN .*RC VERSUS .*PROFILE
- Bottom text: AND AT THIS POINT I'M AFRAID TO ASK
