Two different webs very close together. I like to imagine they'd chat about their days of they could!
Talk about burying the lede...
Please help me
They can, that's how sickening this post is.
...and the Lemming was enlightened
It is what it is!
Don't induction pans have these thick bottoms, which are simply more mass that needs to be heated up? That always took longer than gas with a thin pan for me.
You're talking about two different pans. That's not a theoretical or hypothetical difference. That's an actual difference. Obviously different pans will change things.
Yes, with a $300 cleaning fee, that's exorbitant. I don't think that's justifiable for any amount of cleaning. I firmly believe all "fees" need to be transparently baked into the per night cost.
"I was like, they were like, I was like, they were like" describes the flow of a conversation. That conversation did not happen as you presented it. You're not just wrong, you're lying.
Yes, and those are the exception, not the rule. Even apart from that though, you're sort of expected to be somewhat tidy in a hotel. You aren't meant to be a slob and just trash it. You should have trash in the receptacles and such. So in a suite with a kitchen, "rules" aside, I think most people would consider it polite to at least have dishes in the sink, and probably rinsed off. Like if all the dishes were covered in hard crusty food and all over the place, that would be considered rude. I don't see an issue with codifying expectations like that into rules, and I don't think that rinsing the dishes, loading the dishwasher, and starting it is honestly that difficult of a task. It's just things I would do anyways after eating. I don't want a bunch of nasty dishes hanging out in the sink.
I mean, obviously. They can choose to do anything. They could choose to make it free too, if the investor chose to do so. It's just very different going to some cabin in the mountains versus a bunch of rooms in a hallway. And again, I'm only talking about the idea of small things like doing the dishes. I've seen some things I do consider unreasonable, but I don't think dishes are unreasonable. Asking me to wash the bed sheets and remake the beds, that's an example of something that I find unreasonable. Just wanting all the used sheets and towels in one pile, that's easy and doesn't take any time.
Make IntelliJ IDEA warn for potential NullPointerExceptions during unboxing without assuming everything is @Nullable?
(stackoverflow.com)
Link to a (frustratingly) deleted question on Stack Overflow. Text and image copied below incase you don't have the ability to see it. (Not sure why the image shows multiple times.)
Is there any way to more granularly control IntelliJ IDEA's inspections' "Nullability and data flow problems" option "Treat non-annotated members and parameters as @Nullable"? Preferably for unboxing specifically?
I am aware I can use a variety of @Nullable annotations in a variety of places in the code to make the warnings appear. That's not always an option as the place the boxed primitives are coming from may be other libraries you don't have control over. (Imagine if the Holder record below was from a different project.) I included other examples below to illustrate my point.
public class Sample {
private final Boolean value;
public Sample(Boolean value) {
this.value = value;
}
private boolean isValue() {
return value; // I would like a warning here
}
private static Boolean boxedTrue() {
return true;
}
private static boolean unboxedTrue() {
return boxedTrue(); // No warning here, but that's understandable since never null
}
private static Boolean boxedNull() {
return null;
}
private static boolean unboxedNull() {
return boxedNull(); // Only warning in the file (by default)
// "Unboxing of 'boxedNull()' may produce 'NullPointerException'
}
public record Holder(Boolean value) {}
public boolean openHolder(Holder holder) {
return holder.value(); // I would like a warning here
}
}
When "Treat non-annotated members and parameters as @Nullable" is enabled, the following gives warnings. While that makes sense given the name of the option, there is code like this literally everywhere. It adds hundreds of warnings to my project. I'm trying to find more granular choices.
public static ZonedDateTime timeStuff(LocalDateTime localDateTime, ZoneId zoneId) {
return localDateTime.atZone(zoneId); // I do not want warnings for this
}
I see that the Java Class Library has JetBrains annotations despite not actually being annotated. Is there perhaps some way to add these automatically to libraries if there is no better way to control the inspection?
Literally. I open up my terminal and try to cd Desktop only to be told that no such file exists. I thought for sure everyone this was happening to was just not reading something correctly and were foolish. Nope! It literally began deleting my files.
Edit 2: Even once it's done and you have them locally and not "on demand", the Desktop is in
~/OneDrive/Desktopinstead of~/Desktop. See this helpful comment.
It looks like there might be a way to sort of disable Files on Demand but it looks like it won't let me do it until it's done uploading? I'll post updates.
Not to be dramatic, but I'm really going through it. My mouse logitech mouse is suddenly chattering really bad and double clicking everything. Also while Steam refuses to let me disable auto updates for all games in any sort of easy way. And DDG seems intent on only showing me results related to launching games without updating (as opposed to merely disabling auto updates until I launch). The chatter fixer I found for my mouse does not work and the other requires some logitech program to even try to use. (The repo doesn't mention the name.) This is awful. When it rains it pours, I guess. Literally can't even high light this text to wrap it in a spoiler. This is fucking stupid.
Context: My parents have a family plan for Microsoft 365 they added me too and it has 1 TB of storage I can use. I wouldn't have turned it on otherwise.
Edit: My desktop background has literally vanished and turned solid black.
DO NOT ENABLE ONE DRIVE.
Fuck it, .zshrc it is.
Image transcription:
- Top text: I STILL DON'T KNOW WHAT SHOULD GO IN .*RC VERSUS .*PROFILE
- Bottom text: AND AT THIS POINT I'M AFRAID TO ASK
