I'll plug meshtastic and ham radio, then. Meshtastic (at least in the US, no idea about other places) is legal to do without any sort of license. It's a peer to peer messaging service basically. So imagine like a walkie talkie that sends texts. Ham Radio needs a license but blows the doors open on the types of stuff you can do.
This but unironically.
Depends on the license
In case folks can't find it for some reason: https://quokk.au/comment/5603944
Firefox with uBlock Origin on mobile does that too. That said, I do use Brave on mobile when I need a Chromium browser and the Chrome Mask extension doesn't cut it.
No SecureBoot or TPM
Lovense already does this to an extent. It's not like it mocaps lol but some semblance of interactive, physical sex over the Internet is possible today.
I'm just confused why anyone paying $100,000 for a match making service wouldn't be able to fly first class.
Yeah, that part really shows the entire methodology of the article is bullshit.
And then there’s the phrase. Post after post across the app uses some version of the same line: “he collects women like Pokémon cards.” That’s not a joke somebody made once. That’s the app’s house insult, used so often it might as well ship with the keyboard. The man on the receiving end doesn’t even have to play. You could have never touched a card in your life and still catch this one.
They're proving that this instance of a negative mention of Pokemon doesn't even have to do with someone being interested in the hobby which is the entire premise of the article. But they never mention filtering for this, and then just go on to say that liking Pokemon is the worst hobby stats wise. Not that I'm expecting perfect methodology for something like this, but this is a pretty fucking glaring issue they even openly admit but somehow don't see the problem with it.
Saying someone collects women like Pokemon cards is just an insult about someone being a player, it doesn't have anything to do with someone's hobbies. It could easily be said as collecting women like any other commonly collected item.
AI has gotten scary good over the past year.
Read the comic again, because the answer is clear.
Two different webs very close together. I like to imagine they'd chat about their days of they could!
Link to a (frustratingly) deleted question on Stack Overflow. Text and image copied below incase you don't have the ability to see it. (Not sure why the image shows multiple times.)
Is there any way to more granularly control IntelliJ IDEA's inspections' "Nullability and data flow problems" option "Treat non-annotated members and parameters as @Nullable"? Preferably for unboxing specifically?
I am aware I can use a variety of @Nullable annotations in a variety of places in the code to make the warnings appear. That's not always an option as the place the boxed primitives are coming from may be other libraries you don't have control over. (Imagine if the Holder record below was from a different project.) I included other examples below to illustrate my point.
public class Sample {
private final Boolean value;
public Sample(Boolean value) {
this.value = value;
}
private boolean isValue() {
return value; // I would like a warning here
}
private static Boolean boxedTrue() {
return true;
}
private static boolean unboxedTrue() {
return boxedTrue(); // No warning here, but that's understandable since never null
}
private static Boolean boxedNull() {
return null;
}
private static boolean unboxedNull() {
return boxedNull(); // Only warning in the file (by default)
// "Unboxing of 'boxedNull()' may produce 'NullPointerException'
}
public record Holder(Boolean value) {}
public boolean openHolder(Holder holder) {
return holder.value(); // I would like a warning here
}
}
When "Treat non-annotated members and parameters as @Nullable" is enabled, the following gives warnings. While that makes sense given the name of the option, there is code like this literally everywhere. It adds hundreds of warnings to my project. I'm trying to find more granular choices.
public static ZonedDateTime timeStuff(LocalDateTime localDateTime, ZoneId zoneId) {
return localDateTime.atZone(zoneId); // I do not want warnings for this
}
I see that the Java Class Library has JetBrains annotations despite not actually being annotated. Is there perhaps some way to add these automatically to libraries if there is no better way to control the inspection?
Literally. I open up my terminal and try to cd Desktop only to be told that no such file exists. I thought for sure everyone this was happening to was just not reading something correctly and were foolish. Nope! It literally began deleting my files.
Edit 2: Even once it's done and you have them locally and not "on demand", the Desktop is in
~/OneDrive/Desktopinstead of~/Desktop. See this helpful comment.
It looks like there might be a way to sort of disable Files on Demand but it looks like it won't let me do it until it's done uploading? I'll post updates.
Not to be dramatic, but I'm really going through it. My mouse logitech mouse is suddenly chattering really bad and double clicking everything. Also while Steam refuses to let me disable auto updates for all games in any sort of easy way. And DDG seems intent on only showing me results related to launching games without updating (as opposed to merely disabling auto updates until I launch). The chatter fixer I found for my mouse does not work and the other requires some logitech program to even try to use. (The repo doesn't mention the name.) This is awful. When it rains it pours, I guess. Literally can't even high light this text to wrap it in a spoiler. This is fucking stupid.
Context: My parents have a family plan for Microsoft 365 they added me too and it has 1 TB of storage I can use. I wouldn't have turned it on otherwise.
Edit: My desktop background has literally vanished and turned solid black.
Fuck it, .zshrc it is.
Image transcription:
