I can 100% guarantee at least one athlete is going to be refused entry.
If that is something your boss is managing, get the fuck out of there.
Jean is just the French form of John. It's not a different gendered form.
All I can conclude is that he transitioned to French
It was in 1956 though, why would they count post-redesign throws?
It's just a badly quoted fact.
While this would be great for those "online needed to play" games, wouldn't this also lead to companies preferring subscription models?
I'd assume it's easier to not include multiplayer in the "base" game and just charge a monthly subscription for the online part. Now the proposed law wouldn't apply, since the customer only paid for the base game.
It's pretty obvious what the intention of the writers of the proposal is, but I feel like it could have an opposite effect and push even more to the "games as a service" model those greedy publishers so desperately want.
I think you need to reread that. It doesn't say anything about a "high" bias
I tried out.
All the options you give are allowed, only what OP shows gives the error. While it seems like a good idea, seems the implementation is terrible and only filters out the most obvious ones.
It's just behind a traffic light. Not very safe, but also not as dangerous as it looks.
Pretty much every PA
I watch on mobile and have all ads blocked. There are multiple options a ton of people use
Hawk
0 post score0 comment score
joined 2 years ago
The "Ensors", awards for the Flemish audiovisual sector introduced gender neutral awards last year.
Surprise, all awards went to men.
There's a huge inequality within the sector already, it's not surprising that that reflects in the awards given. It's the same as being surprised that the CEO of the year awards yet again goes to a rich white guy.