Similar tech has been around for a while, and it almost always gets beaten.
Ghost is $170 (US, I'm assuming). Not great but not bad for a wicked cool looking pair of sunglasses. Considering Ray-Bans are around $200 (and, no offense, look like they're from Tesco), and that Ghost are privacy focused, I'd say that price seems not that bad. Still high, though.
I came here to laugh at the ridicule of the The Onion's story, only realize, to my horror, that it's not The Onion...
Iirc fmri tech is not quite there. But if they can get it right, even 50% of the time, it'll be better than what we have now and worth further study resources.
Edit: I see now that there's a whole discussion thread about how unreliable fmri is. Should have read before commenting.
How about you finish the projects you already started on your existing concourses, before you start a new concourse?
I'm still holding out for Mozilla. They've gone all "corporate" lately, but they weren't always that way. Ladybird does look like a good project.
For now, that's possible. But for how long? When mv2 came out, we had a few hold off as long as they could, but now they're all v2 or v3. New technology will always kill the old, whether or not it's better. It's only a matter of time. Going with a browser that has consistently made anticonsumer decisions because a different browser has made a few, doesn't seem like the sensible choice here. Granted, we should have a browser that hadn't made any such decisions, but we don't yet have one that I'm aware (I hope I'm wrong).
otherwise a privacy respecting Chromium browser
With manifest v3 and this thing active on chromium browsers, privacy respecting chromium may not exist.
Did the cow accept their invitation?
Literally the header image...