I once applied for a job where one of the requirements was "minimum 5 to 10 years experience in X". My friend told me to submit a CV saying I have 3 to 6 years experience in X and see if they shortlist me.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 86 points 2 years ago

"Up to 50% off or more!"

  • source
  • [–] 51 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That or when the range is so huge as to be meaningless - a $25k-150k range is completely useless.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 35 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (21 children)
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    The higher bound is an indication of maximum salary. It's saying "we need at least 5 years experience, but if you have 30, we're paying you like you have 5."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [+] 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 24 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Most IT job postings done by recruiters are hilariously bad, I scrolled through some and I'm just like "really? That's all you're telling me?"

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    "expert knowledge in NT, FreeBSD, Cisco IOS, Java, C#, Active Directory, Windows Server, Fortinet". Uh huh. Just be an expert at everything, I see.

    Then you do the interview and they want like 2 of those things and less experience is fine. 🙄

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    A job I'm interviewing for now asked me if I had experience with libvirt, qemu,and KVM.

    (For those not in the know, libvirt is a wrapper around qemu, KVM is the name of the technology, so if you have experience with one or both of the first two, you definitely have experience with the last one).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    man would it be nice if I could just get to the fucking interview

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago*

    This is my first interview after 3 months of applying (not every day, mind you, I've probably applied to like 300 jobs though). I have another one in the next few days as well, for another company.

    LinkedIn Premium does actually seem to help, compared to sites like Dice. Good luck out there, it's pretty rough right now.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I think it means that if you have 10 years of experience you are welcome to apply, but they are only willing to pay commensurate to experience up to 10 years.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    “Minimum” in this could refer not to the number of years but to the criteria of eligibility. The sentence might mean “At minimum you have to pass the following eligibility criteria: between 5 and 10 years experience.”

    If they then give other criteria that you have to match, that’s nonsense :)

    Or I suppose it could mean they’re looking for someone with a minimum of five years, and while they’re not looking for someone with more than 10 years they will consider them. “We want someone with (hard minimum of 5) to (soft maximum of 10) years experience.

    Is the job for someone to improve the clarity of their communications by any chance?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 years ago

    Your first interpretation wasn't the case in this specific ad, because the "minimum 5-10 year experience" was on the list of "essential experience and skills" and there was a separate list of "desirables".

    Your second explanation just supports my original infuriation - just state the range that you're interested in, without calling it a minimum.

    Actually, I got that job, I'm still working for the company, but to your last point, I have to say it's hilarious how bad our communications dept is at communicating to the rest of the company.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    I once had a colleague update a shitty webapp we had written to add a message saying "pages loading may take up to a minute or more"

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    Yeah it's grammatically incorrect but don't we know what they mean? They would settle for 5 years experience if they had to, but 10 years is very much preferred and if they felt they could require 10 they would.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Or say "an average of" and give a range.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Seems like a linear algebra question. Are they trying to test you on the optimal region?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    That means you put it outside of the 70% who have to match.

  • source
  • [+] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    OP isn't saying not to add the requirement. They're saying it should read "minimum 5 years", not "minimum 5 to 10 years" which makes no sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›