[–] 3 points 1 year ago

It's a pun, it's not supposed to be laugh out loud funny. It takes you a second to get it and then you groan and tell the orator to fuck off.

I like it because it will live inside the head of car brains who actually care that much about make and model even though we're all still on the same page and it literally doesn't matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Maybe, but I appreciate the semi-alliteration between "ford-dod-ger" and "dodge-char-ger". Don't read it like a make/model but as a descriptive term (the syllabic stress changes a bit) and it makes a little more sense.

    ...and I've analyzed the joke to death now. You're welcome!

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I don't think they did, the make and model is in the headline of one of their links and they take specific issue with this particular vehicle. And it's true, the dodge brand attracts a lot of asshole drivers that weave through traffic. The misnaming is deliberate and tongue-in-cheek.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I do that with cheese, sausage, and crackers. Like a low effort charcuterie board. But I get tired of it pretty frequently, which makes it entirely unappetizing to me. Like I'd rather not eat and just be hungry if that's my only option. So I have to rotate.

    Right now my easy meal is canned soup.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    I've noticed that inline images will render to fill the available width of the comment they're on. This is much too large for some images, such as emotes that only have so many pixels to display and thus get blown out and fuzzy. I would much prefer inline images to render in their native resolution up until they reach the width of the comment. Is there already a way to change this behavior or is it not something that has been implemented?

    view more: next ›