462
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Under legal pressure to address Wisconsin’s “Swiss cheese” and oddly shaped districts, the Legislature approved redrawn maps that promise to create a new dynamic in a state known for its pivotal role in national politics.

Wisconsin’s dinosaur-shaped legislative district could soon be history.

The curiously drawn district and other oddities associated with the state’s extreme gerrymandering would be erased in new voting maps passed this week by the Wisconsin Legislature.

A state Supreme Court decision finally forced Wisconsin Republicans to cede an advantage they enjoyed for more than a decade with maps that made the state one of the nation’s foremost examples of gerrymandering.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 71 points 1 year ago

If only we could do this in Ohio...

[-] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Constitutionally they have to. That did not stop Republicans from forcing an unconstitutional map, or coursebut at least it was slightly more representative.

Speaking of that...what happened with that lawsuit? I know the Supreme Court said the map was illegal back in 2022.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Ohio's Rs got around it by saying a map that reflected the proportions of elected offices held by each party was "proportionally representative"

It just so happened that due to previous Gerrymandering Republicans held 80% of the elected offices in the state of Ohio.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

Doesn't Ohio have a thing where people can change the constitution with just a petition and enough votes on the ballot?

[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

It does, and a petition is collected signatures. But it still needs to dodge Republican interference (they will probably make the ballot language prejudicial), negative ads about “unelected bureaucrats”, and actually pass.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They passed constitutional abortion rights though, kinda seems like gerrymandering might actually be something that could pass

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It does and we have... Multiple fucking times. They didn't get the message (really obnoxious in the case of the most recent one where they ignored the Ohio Supreme Court because they knew they could wait one cycle and have control of it), we're trying again soon with a "you don't get a say in map making anymore Mr. Politician" approach soon.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Fellow ohioan here, I don't even know what district I'm in anymore because it changes every 2 years when they rig the maps again.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And every other state.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

GET ABSOLUTELY FUCKED VOS!!!! After all the "we're gonna impeach" blah blah whine cry cry cope you slimy shit stain.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

If we want to end gerrymandering but we consistently need districts to be redrawn due to population changes, why not inventovise the nominees to do the work for us?

Release the population data map. Whomever can create the required amount of districts, with the appropriate population with lines of the shortest length has their map used. After Avery census, where the data is release, set a deadline for a certain time, say 1 year, for submissions to be considered.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

Honestly, seeking compactness/shortest lines can create gerrymandered districts too. It can result neighborhoods or population centers being split into multiple districts and having their power diluted.

Drawing convenient/straight boarders can have lasting negative impacts. Just ask the British.

The solution is... Complicated. David Wasserman did a great piece on this many years ago for 538. It's worth a read

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/hating-gerrymandering-is-easy-fixing-it-is-harder/

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

The headline is very misleading.

The new maps do NOT end GOP gerrymandering. The new maps are still very much gerrymandered in favor of the GOP. Just a bit less-so.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I wan not expecting the GOP Minority super Majority to give up power that easily

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The sad reality with decent judges. They don't force their ideals like the corrupt ones do.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

All I hear in this article is “could” and “would”

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Awesome news. Vote! This is the outcome of vote turnout for justice Janet Protasiewicz!

this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2024
462 points (98.5% liked)

News

30790 readers
3164 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS