this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
600 points (97.6% liked)

Games

32694 readers
1034 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This is accurate gameplay from the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy text adventure that INFOCOM made with the help of Douglas Adams in 1984.

I thought people would find it interesting to see the way a game would creatively do a demo in print in the 1980s since doing it other ways was either too expensive or not very useful from a marketing perspective.

More info on the game- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hitchhiker%27s_Guide_to_the_Galaxy_(video_game)

It was very challenging. I never got all the way through it. Amazingly, it only covers a small portion of the first book despite taking hours and hours to play.

(page 2) 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Panic sex!

Who am I kidding...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (4 children)

How did these text based games work? Could you really type any action and it would give a relevant response?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

I couldn't find this one, but if you're interested in playing vintage games, Archive.org has a pretty good list. They also had a way to play some of these in-browser, but I can't find it now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

To answer the title question, how many sips left in my glass?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Next galaxy is farther than needed.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›