offered to pay the charge with his credit card, but German customs rules require half of the charge to be paid in cash.
What a stupid fucking law.
He should've had that shit looked at though, especially being a public person.
requires half to be paid in cash
Tell me you're assisting with corruption without telling me you're assisting with corruption.
There is absolutely no reason to charge half as cash unless you want physical money to conveniently forget to report.
Why do you think so many slightly shady businesses offer cash discounts? If your answer is "only card fees" then you may want to double check that last apple gift card you sent to grandma for her IRS bill actually made it to her.
I don't care if it's John down the street or a major world government. Someone somewhere saw this and thought "ooh, more money we can accidentally misreport"
Sure is a shame that the 17.5k never made it to it's destination. That 15k could have come in handy. You never know when 10k could be useful for stopping terrorists that bring watches into the country. Hard to believe that 5k could be useful, but that 2k is going to be stretched as far as it can go.
First of, I couldn't find anything to corroborate the ~~experience~~ existence of such a rule.
The article might not be entirely accurate.
But even if it were true, you think customs officials just take your money without giving you a receipt?
And how would underreporting even work if the amount is exactly specified?
"Yes, we fined him for 20k, he paid 10k by card and here are the other 8k in cash."
In the US, the way it works is that the cash part never makes it onto the report, though more commonly this happens when the police do a "no knock raid" on "the wrong house" and then empty the family safe. The contents of the safe simply never get reported as evidence or mysteriously disappear from the evidence room without being reported as missing, like a fairly decent portion of the drugs taken as evidence every year does.
In this hypothetical scenario, if he paid by card you'd already have evidence that he was fined and what 50% of the amount was.
So the customs guys would have to bring in the same amount in cash. How would the cash part not make it into the report if there were a rule that there must be a cash part?
And once that is deposited in the bank, nobody can just walk in and make some of it disappear.
Yeah, after making that comment I realized the whole "customs gives you a receipt" thing, whereas the scenario I was talking about basically comes down to your word vs theirs, and what they write in their report. It's a scenario with a lot less accountability than customs has.
but German customs rules require half of the charge to be paid in cash.
What a stupid fucking law.
Never heard of such a rule.
Afaik the reason why he couldn't pay with card was that the card reader was broken.
I have no idea, I just pulled that out of the article linked in the post.
Cash payment = you're a criminal
Poor guy, he fought so hard to stop the AI only to live long enough to see it's rise anyways.
Did he learn nothing from Christopher Walken in Pulp Fiction?
I seem to recall high end watches being a way to avoid carrying large amounts of cash across borders. Maybe even for money laundering (although that seems cumbersome).
People can carry tens or hundreds of thousands across borders in their luggage as personal wardrobe accessories. Once they arrive at their destination, find a dealer who will buy a watch for cash and they have loads of local currency without paying bank transaction fees or getting government haircuts.
Not that I think that's what's going on here, but it may be the media shining a spotlight on it for some reason.
It’s better to wear the watch and jewelry if you’re having that intent.
This is the worst thing that has ever happened at a Munich airport..
I'm going to assume you're telling the truth and not look it up.
I assume nothing and looked it up.
It was a joke. That was an extremely well-known event which Steven Spielberg made a movie about and it was nominated for a bunch of Oscars.
I've never seen the movie. I've only learned about this event today. You learn something new everyday.
Edit: The movie isn't even about the same event. I've learned 2 new things today...
You learned something new too early in the day. Make sure you don't learn anything else.
I live like 500 meter from the memorial so I knew about it, and I'm sure it's quite famous in Manchester, but I don't think it's an extremely well known event.
When Steven Spielberg makes a movie about something, I'd say it's pretty well known.
I agree.
Now he’s going to be on some kind of watch list!
That's who we need on Lemmy.
Because Margot Robbie is getting us nowhere.
I'd be more upset if the headline read "Arnold Schwarzenegger commited tax fraud but was let through because he's famous"
I'll be back
Just have to run to an ATM.
And buy some firepower.
It'll be back........
Is this a German thing? I've traveled many times between Canada and the USA and never had to fill any customs form.
Edit: Boy oh boy. I thought Reddit was the toxic place, but can't ask a damn question in here without getting slammed with downvotes?
Most countries dislike people registered as tourists carrying products intended for commerce. In this instance it was intended for auctioning even with the proceedings going to a charitable org but maybe the German law doesn't make a distinction (it seems an edge case that possibly wouldn't have been codified).
There's a threshold for declaration at the US-Canada border too. Your odds of getting searched in a car at the canada-us border are low, though.
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.