I feel the same about SEO stuff. Stuff that's designed to attract peoples attention doesn't just not work on me, it often repels me. Some of it actively irritates me. Some of it I can't even stand to look at.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 3 points 18 hours ago

Counterpoint: people who believe themselves to be immune to propaganda are actually the most susceptible of all.

ND people (specifically autism spectrum) disproportionately think they are more resistant to propaganda than NT people.

Ergo, ND people are on the whole more susceptible to propaganda than NT people. Especially propaganda that makes them feel superior

Disclosure: I am AuDHD

  • source
  • [–] 76 points 1 day ago (23 children)

    Everybody thinks they are immune to ads and nobody is

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (11 children)

    I'm immune to ads because I'm broke.

    Edit: if a piece of advertising for, say, a video game caused me to pirate it, would that be considered as the advertisement working? Like is me downloading the fitgirl repack of Oblivion a win or a loss for Bethesda's marketing department?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    You just did a word-of-mouth for Oblivion

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    I did word-of-mouth for Oblivion in the same breath as a location for where to obtain it without giving money to capital. That's hardly guerilla marketing.

    I didn't even say it was good. I'd recommend not paying money for it, at the very least.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 19 hours ago (1 child)

    Sounds like you fundamentally don't understand how advertising works

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 hours ago

    Quite literally, not figuratively, literally the opposite. I only recognise the fundamentals of advertisement as real advertisement.

    Fundamentally. Truly fundamentally. Think of advertising is hawking what you have and want to barter. Before the written word, before currency, before metalworking, before fire. I have pretty rocks, give berries for rocks. This I recognise as advertising. Spoken word can be put to heiroglyphs, it can be carved into rock, it can be written on papyrus. That's a natural evolution. A billboard, a radio spot, a TV segment, whatever.

    What is not natural is the corporate metrics invented by suits in a boardroom to justify their salary. I do not recognise that simply mentioning [product] is advertisement for the product. If it's not a liminal endorsement, then it was invented by rich people to swindle other rich people. They've taken us for fools.

    "Oh it keeps [product] in the minds of the consu-" "We will market laterally through synergising with grassroots discus-" "So we can optimise for emerging trends to keep-" "We can implement an ARG to supplement our SEO optim-" listen to these sentences. Ramblings of the deranged. That's not advertisement, that's white collar astrology. If their sales increase (by pure co-incidence), then they get to have a cocaine party and pat themselves on the back. If it does jack shit, it's everyone else's fault but theirs. I'm sure that capeshit vampire movie was the most discussed film of that year, but if the corporate strategy actually worked, it would have been the most profitable film of all time, and yet it ate shit. Twice.

    This corporate bullshit is advertising in the same way a chiropractor is a healthcare worker.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    It's very rare to ever overtly be convinced by one to buy something on the spot, but that's not the primary function of ads. Simply getting the brand name into the zeitgeist as one of the available options is sufficient. Just reminding you of the existence of a brand so the next time in 4 months when you're buying a product you will consider it in your list of available best options - it has done its work. The effects of ads on each individual is minor, the effects of ads on the population is major.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Just reminding you of the existence of a brand so the next time in 4 months when you're buying a product you will consider it in your list of available best options - it has done its work.

    The effects of ads on each individual is minor, the effects of ads on the population is major.

    Ads don't need to convince you or even remind you of their existence. They just need to convince your family and your friends. So when your family and friends remind you of a brand existing 4 months later, it feels like part of a completely organic conversation and not something a corpo planted in their heads 4 months earlier.

    Super Bowl ads are the most obvious example. The number of people who actually see the ad airing is not that high all things considered. But the countless "hey, did you see that ad during the Super Bowl" water cooler conversations in the following week means the entirety of the US (and much of the Western world) is reminded that the brand still exists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 1 day ago* (4 children)

    I've immunized myself to ads as best I can by refusing to engage with any technology or service which I can't get an adblock into.

    I use a speech to text LLM to remove them from podcasts, I don't watch TV, I don't have traditional social media, I wear headphones in shops with radio ads, haven't watched youtube or listened to music without an adblock. If adblocks ever stopped working I would just stop using a service outright.

    I still understand they influence me because companies wouldn't use them otherwise. They are mental pollution and I've had to do a lot of work to get rid of a fraction of them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 29 points 1 day ago (1 child)
    1. I hate the conflation of autism and ND. Autism is a type of ND. It's not the end-all be-all.

    2. Marketing is first and foremost you being aware of brand^TM^ existence. Every commodity has thousands of brands competing for your attention. Just getting you to be aware of their existence is like 3/4 of the battle. It's a fight to not be a no-name brand but a brand^TM^ that you are vaguely aware of it existing.

    3. Corpos absolutely target autistic people because an autistic person with disposable income who has adopted brand^TM^ as their special interest is a near bottomless goldmine. They will chase that whale.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 39 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    If autistic people were immune to propaganda there would be no autistic anticommunists.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 37 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Nobody is immune to propaganda.

    Nobody.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

    Marketing is about incepting or forcing a product into your brain whether you like it or not, so that if you are in a purchasing decision you are oriented towards choosing the one that got there first or is there in front of you first, to whichever degree you are aware of it or not. Whether by allure, or repetition, or product description and explanation, or placement and convenience (including mental availability, familiarity, heuristics, novelty vs comfort seeking, etc.), there will be a method or confluence of methods that works on you. It's not just ads. It will wear you down and you will be influenced in some way or form. You are not immune to propaganda, you are not immune to marketing.

    (The example I like to cite is those irritating 5s KFC YouTube ads. They are designed to be irritating to deliberately displace the competition (Hungry Jacks, Red Rooster) both within the advertising space and within your active recall. Then, when you see a KFC ad in other locations you think of that irritating ad and it reinforces those neural pathways, further cementing it in your brain and locking out competitors whether you buy from KFC or not)

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Many times it's just about just creating a need that isn't there in the first place, and then selling a product to solve that need.

    People who think they're immune to marketing are just immune to bad marketing. There's also so much more money being spent in B2B marketing than B2C, and the former ultimately decides what's on shelves before you get any choice in the matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 32 points 1 day ago (13 children)

    Yeah, this is absolutely not true. Otherwise Pokemon, Magic and Yu-Gi-Oh wouldn't have an adult fan base.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    My AuDHD friend back in high school got into Pokemon for the very first time in 2010 because the girl he had a crush on had a Pokemon trinket thing on her backpack at school. I believe it was a Piplup. So of course, he went and researched Pokemon and bought a Nintendo DS with his Christmas money and also developed encyclopædic knowledge on Pokemon.

    Does this count as advertisement working on him or not?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 day ago*

    That is what, in the business, is sometimes referred to as peer to peer advertising. Basically the concept is that one of the best ways to advertise something is to convince someone they look up to, or consider attractive, to buy an aspect of the product, thus convincing others to get into it and buy it. It is the basis for influencer advertising, which works through the pseudo-peer, but much more subtle.

    Marketing people are operating at a bunch of levels, much of which is convincing the people that pay them that even their indirect advertising is purposeful, which to a large degree it is.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 33 points 1 day ago
    [–] 31 points 1 day ago (9 children)

    Advertising is like an attack on my sense, it repulses me when I'm forced to sit through an ad. I use ad blockers in my daily life, but my parents listen to the radio and the ads are insufferable, I have to leave the room when they come on. I don't know how they can bare it, ads are the most grating and inhuman thing you could listen to constantly.

    Advertising is such a massive waste of labour. So many creative and hardworking people end up making fucking ads for the sake of selling product after product instead of doing something helpful to society. Imagine a world where you don't see ads 24/7, and the energy put towards making ads is used for actual communication with communities, art, education, fucking anything but advertisement.

    It's awful. I hate advertisement so much I hate it I hate it I hate it

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 day ago

    Hey, even Pat Tillman fell for the propaganda (with the worst possible outcome), so don't be too hard on yourselves.

    It's probably the best propaganda in human history. Very had to switch it off in your brain.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Can't buy more things if you spent all of childhood without the agency to buy things and the first 8 years of adulthood without the ability, so you're conditioned to only spend money on shelter, food, transportation, and making sure you continue to have these things in the future.

    Shelf placement has 10 times the purchasing effect on me that any commercial ever will. Worldview and subconscious is probably a different story tho.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I don't like it. I can imagine an autistic person who is less susceptible to a car advertisement about how cool you look driving it still being interested when they say it's the 2nd safest car with the 1st most fuel efficiency.

    Then a lot of modern marketing isn't really introducing you to the idea of McDonald's, but more about giving you a couple seconds to think about McDonald's. Therefore next time that market sector is hungry, a larger (perhaps 0.3%) section of the fluid dynamic movement of people going out to eat will choose it over Wendy's this time. In that sense, an investor meeting where they admit that customers don't have any discretionary money left is as much advertising as a brand account commenting on a tiktok

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Since most of the good discussion has been had already, I'll say that seeing mccrucified ads outside on billboards while im-vegan and bds is just a bruh moment


    ⓘ Remember to enable JPEG-XL support in your browser, even on your phone!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 36 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child)

    SEO is not meant to appeal to humans, it's not "human interest optimization," it is "search engine optimization". It is meant to take advantage of how search engines work and common terminology people use to have higher search engine rankings. Allistic people also find crass SEO writing annoying.

    The third textbox in the meme looks like an AI summary, and either way I think it's basically wank. To the extent there is a difference in marketing working on autistic vs allistic people, it's just a matter of which tricks are more effective, and you can fry an autistic person's brain with pseudo-science just as much as an allistic person's. You can say that the phrasing means my statement and the textbox's are not strictly mutually exclusive, which is true but misses the point of what it means to be misleading, and the text still is clearly overgeneralizing about things not working on autistic people when it's just that some things don't work as well while other things that are also used also work.

    Incidentally, this meme is an example of autistic people not being immune to extremely low-effort propaganda.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 11 points 1 day ago

    Monke sees ad: neuron-activation porky-happy

    Neuron activation: monke-rage

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 1 day ago

    Wouldn't know, haven't seen an ad in years programming-communism

    Also, back when I did see ads, I had no discretionary income

    Maybe part of it is we aren't lucrative to target for general consumer goods, and we barely need to be targeted at all for special interests

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 day ago

    I haven't seen an advert in years. I'm generally repulsed by most things too.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›