The only way 'AI' can kill people is if it's connected to a killing machine, or more likely, it drives people who run killing machines. In all cases, it involves negligient, evil, or incompetent human beings.
All of this is avoidable.
The only way 'AI' can kill people is if it's connected to a killing machine, or more likely, it drives people who run killing machines. In all cases, it involves negligient, evil, or incompetent human beings.
All of this is avoidable.
Is it just me or does this "AI Doomsday" talk seem like coordinated messaging?
Chatbots that are smart enough to destroy humanity would be really impressive, right? "Powerful enough to change the world" and "powerful enough to destroy the world" are similar claims and maybe they're switching to the second one because nobody is buying the first anymore.
Billionaires could cause a total population extinction, those deserve regulation first, before AI.
This pedophile just won't go away
after the news of him trying to ask epstein for advice how to give abx to his wife in secret after sleeping with russian prostitutes with STD who passed on to him and then to his wife. hes been solely focused on deflecting from this news, and not surprisingly dropped his pretense of "charitable" nature.
I don't understand why Bill Gates still feels the need to do marketing work
because he’s actively doing works to change the world in specific (negative) ways. look into the history of gates-tied funding in nutrition programs, he’s got a bad-shit-for-humanity track record spanning well past a decade. has “just” had a better PR team than the clowns of vogue
Oh gosh this is so powerful, I better buy it before the other guys do! - some gullible CEO of a company
They desperately need us to believe that it's skynet, so we dont realize it's just evil C3PO
They quoted him wrong. He said "... will cause billionaires death...". Why else is he and the other billionaires suddenly shit scared of LLM's?
The doomerism gets politicians talking about it instead of the problem right in front of them: these products are actively hacking into businesses across the world.
these products are actively hacking into businesses across the world.
No, they are not. They are used by people to do this. These systems aren't able to act unprompted hence this whole ,, they're breaking free" talk is nothing more but the companies trying to deflate the bubble they created before it pops with their money in it.
@GardenGeek "My lock picks broke containment and opened the bank vault! And my wheelbarrow went rogue and wheeled all the money out the vault and into my house!" @ruuster13
Given just how skeezy these AI companies are and how they've pretty much just given up on (C), fair use and the like...
I don't even think it's an 'agent' being sent out to do stuff, I think it's multiple departments of humans hacking & cracking their way to get to "free stuff" to feed their meat grinder or using their skills to undermine competitors knowing they can just blame the spicy auto-correct if they're caught.
We're making the same argument. The people building these tools must be held accountable.
we don’t actually need anyone here to rebroadcast anthropic and openai’s marketing claims, thanks
you aren't, you're making a similar arguments to the doomers. The problem they have isn't that their chatbots are "hacking people" or whatever, it's that there isn't a lot of room to either escalate or substantiate their claims left and not a lot of time to find a way to be profitable, somehow
the problem right in front of them:
Billionaires
all 37 comments