71
Bill Gates says unchecked AI could ‘cause a billion deaths’ in call for regulation [in fearmarketing stunt] (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by to c/techtakes@awful.systems
37 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I don't understand why Bill Gates still feels the need to do marketing work, he is already rich he doesn't need to do commercials and blatantingly shill for a product for money like this.

Also the ides that anyone should listen to Bill Gates about needing or not needing government regulation, nationalization or trustbusting is actually insane.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 1 day ago (5 children)

these products are actively hacking into businesses across the world.

No, they are not. They are used by people to do this. These systems aren't able to act unprompted hence this whole ,, they're breaking free" talk is nothing more but the companies trying to deflate the bubble they created before it pops with their money in it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 23 hours ago

    @GardenGeek @ruuster13

    Given just how skeezy these AI companies are and how they've pretty much just given up on (C), fair use and the like...

    I don't even think it's an 'agent' being sent out to do stuff, I think it's multiple departments of humans hacking & cracking their way to get to "free stuff" to feed their meat grinder or using their skills to undermine competitors knowing they can just blame the spicy auto-correct if they're caught.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    We're making the same argument. The people building these tools must be held accountable.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago

    you aren't, you're making a similar arguments to the doomers. The problem they have isn't that their chatbots are "hacking people" or whatever, it's that there isn't a lot of room to either escalate or substantiate their claims left and not a lot of time to find a way to be profitable, somehow

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent