top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 82 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 60 points 1 month ago (25 children)

    There's no single point -- it's a gradual process.

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • load more comments (24 replies)
    [–] 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    This suggests the existence of the poop event horizon. Science totally rocks man.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 month ago (15 children)

    Umm no? Have you never vomited? I'm not sure I'd call that "food". I guess, maybe, it's still food after you've finished chewing it; you could spit it out into your hand instead of swallowing, and someone else could choke it down. But it stops being food long before it hits the intestines. At some point when it starts mixing with stomach acid, probably.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] [S] 17 points 1 month ago (5 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Some dogs eat shit (literally)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [+] 21 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Fun fact: some people stop it near the top or middle, and alter nature's plumbing

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ileo-anal_pouch

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago

    That point is much closer to your mouth than it is the other end of the system.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago

    Yeah, it's called the pyloric sphincter.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Kissing is just sucking on the better end of two digestive tracts.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 9 points 4 weeks ago

    If you divide a woman in half horizontally one side has poop and the other side has boob and both are plaindromes. Also you will go to jail.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    More like a slush of gastric acid and whatever you ate, but in principle, I agree. :)

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    but if go backwards, you get assburgers.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 4 weeks ago

    Ah, the food of Theseus.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    It’s no black and white situation.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    The most undialectical shit post

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    It's like a Food of Theseus.

    Bit by bit the food is replaced with a bit of poop, at which point does it cease being food?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Reminds me of philosophical question of a boy eating an apple: at what point does it cease to be the apple and become the boy? I suppose this is a similar question: at what point does it cease to be an apple and become a turd?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago
    [–] 4 points 4 weeks ago*

    I don't think you can call what's in your intestines food, once it leaves the stomach. The stomachs job is kind of to make it not food anymore

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 4 weeks ago

    If you eat Taco Bell, it goes in and comes out exactly the same. I honestly don't know how they manage to keep collecting, processing, and serving the same diarrhea since 1962, but it's no wonder they'll win the Franchise Wars.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›