I think it fits the community. It's the headline that matters, not the article itself. Though this is a fantastic article.
Monster has a flavor now called Pacific Punch, which tastes exactly like Hawaiian Punch did back in the 90s (the current Hawaiian Punch recipe is atrocious), and I love it so much.
Well duh, that's because of all the energy!
That's because Reddit bans VPN IP addresses. You still have an IP address when using a VPN, and VPN IPs aren't exactly secret information. Reddit blocks all the VPNs they know of with an ever-updating blacklist.
VPNs prevent the site from attaching an IP address to the site visit
While this is a popular selling point that VPN providers like to advertise, it's pretty misleading in terms of what this actually means with regards to tracking. Realistically, this does almost nothing to prevent sites from tracking you. They don't see you at your home IP as "John Smith" and see you on your VPN as "Hans Schneider", instead they see you at your home IP as "John Smith" and on your VPN as "still John Smith, but either traveling in Germany or using a European VPN".
Advertisers have tens of thousands of individual data points on nearly every single person who uses the internet at all for any purpose. All a VPN does is obfuscate ONE data point. That's less than 1% effectiveness at hiding your identity from advertisers. A VPN does basically nothing against all the other fingerprinting methods advertisers have.
Think of using a VPN like speaking into a walkie-talkie: your voice comes out at a different location, but if the person on the other end already knows what your voice sounds like, then they still know who you are, just not necessarily where you are. Unless you're taking other efforts to mask your voice, the walkie-talkie isn't protecting your identity in any way. Likewise with a VPN, if you go to the same sites from the same devices and log into the same accounts and otherwise engage in the same online behavior, the VPN is only hiding where you are, but it's still trivially easy for an advertiser to determine who you are.
This is a bit of a pet peeve of mine, because VPN providers harp on this idea so hard in their advertisements that it tricks people into thinking VPNs are capable of things that they just simply are not.
The problem is that reddit and others can instantaneously put your years-long effort behind a paywall. I'm not joking. Look at these:
Those aren't paywalls.
meanwhile i'm using VPNs in browser's incognito mode to not be tracked
That's not what a VPN or incognito modes do.
Reddit sucks for a number of reasons, but your internet literacy also kinda sucks.
Reticulating splines...
"Slight"
Emiru did a short stream going into additional details about the incident, as well as some other fuck-ups by Twitch staff that weren't mentioned in this article.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_USuIpVAqAw
tl;dw: Emiru calls out Twitch for lying about the situation in their official statements, expresses concern for what sort of response a smaller streamer would've gotten if they were attacked like this, and draws attention to Twitch's lack of security and professionalism. Twitch staffers originally laughed about the situation to Emiru's face, and didn't seem to care until the video went viral. They ran background checks on everybody who signed up for her meet-and-greet event, but the attendees were allowed to bring a plus-one with them, who did NOT have to get background checked. Twitch staff also allowed people to walk around even after their badges couldn't scan properly.
Also, because this isn't anywhere near the first time Emiru has been attacked in public, she points out that she's spent tens of thousands of dollars for her own private security, and wasn't even allowed to bring her preferred bodyguard with her because he's permanently banned from Twitch events due to restraining a stalker during a previous event.
Twitch fucked up big time here.
Admins should only be looking at who downvotes posts when there is some sort of history of vote-abuse happening. Somebody voicing their opinion with their votes is a perfectly valid use of the upvote/downvote system.
PTB
At what point do we declare this a coup? This isn't what even the most diehard conservatives out there voted for, I don't understand how this isn't considered a hostile takeover.
Chozo
0 post score0 comment score
I'm not sure "per stream" is a useful metric, as artists don't see equal stream counts from each of these platforms due to huge difference in these platforms' reach. YouTube ranks low on this list, but I imagine they're the highest if sorted by total stream count. So while YouTube may pay low "per stream", they may still be the larger revenue source for some artists just due to the total plays they receive over other platforms. Not saying this in defense of YouTube or any other streaming platforms, just saying this in defense of math; I can't imagine that many artists on these platforms are receiving larger checks from Napster each month than they are from YouTube.
There's lots of other factors to consider, too. Each of these platforms have varying degrees of providing alternate revenue to artists, through ad subsidies, merch stores, concert ticket sales, etc. Also, how much the platform pays out per stream, and how much the artist receives per stream, aren't always going to be the same amount, as labels will generally take a cut of this revenue first.
This graph really doesn't tell a full story.