all 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 189 points 1 month ago (27 children)

“We especially want to thank our parent company Paramount — a Skydance Capitulation.”

They must have some serious fuck you money.

  • source
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [–] 116 points 1 month ago (10 children)
  • [–] 50 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    its kinda funny because I think they did not like them so made this outrageous offer and paramount accepted and they made sure no caveats so they could do all sorts of things that would make paramount want to drop them but they are in too deep.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    well that's the thing. It's a catch 22. All the stuff that would make paramount want to drop them? People will get subscriptions to stream it just to see the episodes. So Paramount then wants to keep them from a money standpoint.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    I'm just surprised South Park generates that much money to be worth it. It's Microsoft buying Minecraft kinds of money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Paramount is gonna bring about their own reckoning, I swear

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 1 month ago

    Most people refer to "fuck you money" as enough money to be able to say "fuck you" to anyone. They're a little bit different in that they started off by saying "fuck you" to anyone, and then got obscenely rich by doing that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    At this point they could absolutely live off the residuals from Baseketball or Orgasmo and still be just fine with what they've got in the bank.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Don't forget about The Book of Mormon rights as well.

    Both Matt & Trey are only one Oscar away from pulling off an EGOT.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago

    Heh well that was relatively popular. The other two are kind of reviled or unknown? Which was intended as a tongue in cheek way of stating that if they didn't make any more money from this day forward they'd still be just fine lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    I like to think they'd be able to get an Oscar, if they really wanted to. Their style just doesn't mesh with the Academy's taste, and I don't think they want to produce something that's 'not them'.

    Maybe they could pull off a world war 2 drama with Mr. Hanky. I don't think he'd have that high-pitched voice in the movie. He could play some scruffy veteran who learns about the darkness of himself and humankind, with 'Feeling Good on a Wednesday' levels of frisson. The funniest parts of the movie shouldn't be any more edgier than the sharpest parts of Benigni's Life is Beautiful. The poop will be drawn by the AI engine they created. Every character would be someone from South Park (real people though, so casting might get tough), and they would more or less be their own character in that situation, but not played out for laughs.

    I guess the AI Mr Hanky might be a bit too much, but I think they could pull something off that is a stand-alone movie that pays fan service all the way. I'm not saying it's easy to win an Oscar, but Ricky Gervais made Kate Winslet predict she is getting one herself.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Yeah, they signed a deal for $2b guaranteed (as in, even if the show got cancelled tomorrow, they'd still get paid in full) and probably with some great if not total protections against censorship.

    It's the kind of deal that no sane TV exec would agree to (especially with the likes of Parker & Stone), but I guess the execs just wanted the show THAT much.

    And they're taking great advantage of those loose if even existent reins! ✊🏻😄

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago* (3 children)

    This has been their thing for decades now!

    I don’t really like South Park but I have always respected their level of “fuck you.” As an example, they went to the Oscars on acid in 2000.

    You don’t have to have money to say fuck you, just an appropriate level of contempt.

    I think they’d be doing this anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 88 points 1 month ago

    “Inspired by the bravery and patriotism of Apple and Google, we are changing the name of ‘South Park’ to ‘South America,'” the pair shared in a statement. “We especially want to thank our parent company Paramount — a Skydance Capitulation.”

  • source
  • [–] 83 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Its time for Team America 2 Make America America again.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    If they changed the name to “Donald Trump is a child rapist”, would paramount be obligated to display the full name on their platform?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    only if the show is running for office. given the current supreme court don't be surprised if a television show is soon allowed to do that. corporations are people after all, why wouldn't a television show be?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    I had to triple check it's not the onion. Absolutely based.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    The other day, I commented that I couldn't tell if the headline that Trump wanted to change New Mexico to New America was real or satire. And reading this headline, I also couldn't tell if it was real or satire.

    Although, South Park is satire, so I guess them doing it is... both real and satire?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I'm just worried about other people doing this unironically and co-opting the message. The message that we live in incredibly stupid times.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    I mean of course they will. I love those dudes

  • source
  • [+] -11 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    I wouldn't mind South Park being relevant again. It's been a while.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    The entire last season was amazing. The show had a few less popular episodes, but they've always been relevant and funny.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Maybe I need to jump back in. I think the last time I really watched it was like 5 years ago and it just seemed like it was trying too had.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    First seasons of South Park were kinda shit imo - leaned almost entirely on swearing and things like poop jokes for their humor. There's an audience for that to be sure, but... meh. Then they had a golden era of some outsanding satire - that shit was great. Then it kinda fizzled back to just swearing and poop jokes for a bit.

    Previous poster is one of many saying the recent seasons made a comeback, which is awesome to hear. I'm in the same boat you are - kinda clocked out... at least 5 years ago, idr the last time I watched a full episode. Sounds like I've got some catching up to do.

  • source
  • parent