388
Low rating (thelemmy.club)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] wowwoweowza@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

So grateful not to be afflicted with this.

[-] tyranny@crazypeople.online 12 points 11 hours ago

as far as I'm concerned, foot fetishists are the bravest people on earth

[-] MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

I watched End of Oak Street last night. Even though the characters learned that they are kinda trapped thier house, they all still kept their shoes and socks on. Found that interesting

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

So you're saying it's a 1 star and you've unsubscribed?

[-] Zozano@aussie.zone 12 points 16 hours ago

Whenever I think of foot fetishists I think of the anime character Rin Tohsaka, because of her name.

"Watch your piggies, Rin Toe Sucker is coming!"

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

I gotta steal part of that name for my next Gloomhaven character

[-] Zozano@aussie.zone 4 points 14 hours ago

Definitely the Rin part, right?

[-] 58008@lemmy.world 21 points 20 hours ago

My take on feets: I don't think about them in my fantasies or anything, but if they're there IRL, they represent a further opportunity to add to the other person's pleasure, so I'll have a go on them. But I don't get turned on by the act of licking soles in and of itself. I've never seen a pair of feet and thought "daaaaaaaaaaamn, those are some HOT feets!" no more than I've seen a garden fence and thought "burn down all other fences, 'cause THIS is the one!" Although, I'm sure I've seen plenty of feet that caused my neutrality to dip into disgust (like my own, for example). But beyond that, I don't think about them at all. They're just an extra button on my controller in the indecipherable non-localised Slavic RPG that is the female orgasm.

[-] b_n@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 hours ago

Never have my thoughts been written down so accurately as right now 🤝. I can understand many other fetishes. Feet I just really struggle to comprehend. Not that that matters, more power to the foot fetishers etc.

[-] BetterDev@programming.dev 5 points 17 hours ago

You got my upvote

[-] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 147 points 1 day ago

Gotta love the footies. They're harmless and locked in. At the rabbit hole that is sexual fetishes, they just hang around the entrance... looking down.

I don't think about feet at all, until a story like this pops up.

You perfectly summed up footies, normies love to bug them for the weirdness but honestly, pretty wholesome all told.

[-] imadethis@fedinsfw.app 19 points 1 day ago

I think we must have had very different experiences in life. I think the only fetish I ever hear about in the news in a 'bad way' is feet.

In the past two or three decades, I want to say there have been at least one or two stories per year about some cop in the area letting people off of tickets if they'll let the officer lick their feet. We have incredibly large furry conventions, anime conventions, tattoo conventions, reptile owner conventions, and probably more that touch on various kinks and fetishes, but you never hear about any of those sexual shenanigans in the news... so feet fetish folks finding themselves featured on frontline feeds frequently from the news is quite the contrast.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

I think the story is more about the damn skeezy cop(s?) than their specific kinks tho

[-] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 7 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Right, because its the mainstream acceptable stand-in for "weird fetishes" and it fits in the mainstream because its NOT scary.

[-] kboos1@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Letting people off the hook in exchange for foot stuff an entirely different problem. I think the focus misplaced.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] WereCat@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago

Foot for thought

[-] Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 day ago

Another poster said the commentor is talking about a youtuber named gabi belle, who afaik posts ZERO sexual content and even if she did that still wouldnt make her an object for your personal sexual satisfaction.

[-] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Zero sexual content with the name like ‘Gabi Belle’? I've jerked off already, no need for anything extra.

[-] Blibly@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

No you don't understand she's a woman showing her face therefore she's a sex object

[-] Viceversa@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Anyone inherently is a sex object

[-] ignotum@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago

The commenter said she posted that she wanted her score on the foot rating site to be higher, which seems like pretty clear consent to objectify her feet.

[-] sas41@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Hate how you're so upvoted because not only is your information third or fourth hand depending on perspective, you also outright believe it and knit your idea of consent around such weak thread.

She's joking, if anything this is a defeatist joke around the fact that she is nearly powerless when it cones to being objectified and sexualized without her consent, and the dark humor on display is very on brand. So the screenshotted comment, presumably a viewer of hers, should be familiar with her style of comedy and her struggles with being objectified and her likeness being misused.

So that comment is by someone who either does the exact thing to her that she doesn't want, or they are genuinely so porn pilled that they genuinely haven't ever picked up on what she's talking about and are only there to objectify and sexualize her.

I would not have bothered to comment unless I knew enough about her, her content and the thoughts she shared surrounding these things, I suggest we all adopt this approach in the future.

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Uh, I posted her original tweet, literally first hand information.

You can argue that it's a joke, but when you literally go online and say "Please rate my feet higher", you can't be surprised when people take you at face value and do the thing you specifically asked for.

When you make a post in a public space, you can't expect everyone to know your lore. For example, my wife is a brown immigrant and I'll make racist jokes to her about her ethnicity, which she laughs at because she knows I'm not racist and I'm punching at racism itself, not her race. But if I post those same jokes in public, people will assume I'm racist because they don't have the context my wife does.

If she made the joke in the middle of a stream with context, you'd have a point. But she didn't, she made a standalone tweet, and even said "Please". That reads as pretty unambiguous consent.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] phar@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago

I do not understand humans

[-] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 day ago

I... don't get it. Explain the joke?

[-] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 17 points 1 day ago

I think the joke is that people are nuts. I mean, imagine blurring your feet when you already have a presence on wikifeet 🙄.

^/s

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2026
388 points (97.3% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41374 readers
4786 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS