343
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 54 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

tl;dr: You don't get one.

Why? Several reasons:

  1. The companies you purchased from aren't legally required to,
  2. The accounting would be difficult,
  3. Companies can easily claim they never increased prices in the first place (eating the cost), and
  4. Companies pinky-swear to "pass the savings on to you" in the future.
[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago
  1. This was literally the point of the whole thing.

Levy import taxes to justify increasing prices on everything, then refund the taxes back to the companies while keep the new higher prices. It was a universal price hike in disguise.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago
  1. The entire country is literally a scam.
[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago
[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 19 hours ago

Well it is, so, take it up with God I guess, or maybe try something more productive than that.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

All consumer fines should go into the America First Fund (irony intended), to be the seed money for all the Social programs we need to implement.

Billionaire and corporate fines should start at $1 billion per count, no matter how small the infraction, with money going to the America First Fund. Companies that have behaved particularly egregiously should be confiscated, and operated with the profits going to the America First Fund, and their owners stripped of their fortunes. Those who have been punished in such a manner will not be allowed to access the benefits of the AAF, they have lost those privileges of our society. In the future, the only destitute people in America will be formerly bad behaving Sociopathic Oligarchs. When you see a homeless person on the side of the road, you will know they are former billionaire shitheads, who EARNED their homelessness through their Sociopathic behavior.

The AAF will stand alongside the Dow, and be discussed on the evening news. When they announce the daily results of the Dow, S&P, and NASDAQ for the wealthy, they will also announce the AAF, for the Citizens, and to daily remind the wealthy that's where their fortunes are destined if they don't operate their businesses to benefit society.

Those fines belong to the Citizens, and should directly benefit the Citizens.

[-] switcheroo@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago

WE PAID THE TARRIFS AND WE PAID FOR THE REFUNDS

[-] daychilde@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I keep hearing that, but I don't think it's true. Companies did pay money to the government, and now that money is being refunded to the companies.

The consumers get screwed, of course, but I think it's a single screwing, not a double one. Unless someone can show me something where companies are getting money they didn't pay out in the first place.

Edit: downvote but not tell me how you think we paid twice? Nice.

[-] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 3 points 1 day ago

Are you saying prices didn't go up?

[-] daychilde@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago

No. Dork. That is the money we paid.

We paid it once in higher prices. Not twice like claimed that I replied to.

[-] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 0 points 1 day ago

You called me a name and it made me sad.

[-] SGG@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The wording I would say is correct more than it is wrong.

Companies did pay tariffs directly, and because of this I would say nearly all increased consumer pricing for effected goods, so indirectly people paid for those tariffs.

With the refunds going out, while ideally it would be a simple refund, the cost is performing the refunds (in man hours and potential transaction fees) which is the additional cost to taxpayers.

I would also say the number of companies deciding to send those refunds on to consumers is extremely low, they're just keeping the refund.

So it is definitely not regular people being "double dipped", which is what the original line may imply, but yeah, it's seemingly been used as a way for companies to make extra profit from people at the taxpayers expense.

[-] daychilde@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The wording I would say is correct more than it is wrong.

This wording? The wording I replied to:

WE PAID THE TARRIFS AND WE PAID FOR THE REFUNDS

People absolutely paid for the tariffs in increased pricing.

The ovehead of the refunds would be insignificant.

The companies don't have to send any money to consumers to cancel us paying twice, because we paid once in high prices. If they hold on to the refunds, we will have still only paid once...... with higher prices.

So it is definitely not regular people being “double dipped”, which is what the original line may imply,

So basically, what I said you don't even disagree with. And yet I got downvotes. Lemmy is quite irritating. People seem to prefer emotions over facts.

[-] Corgwn@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

The revenue created by the tariffs was used as justification for legislation like the One Bill Ugly Bill as well. The double dip is that after everything, consumers have both less cash now and the growth of the federal deficit was accelerated even further. That, at the end of the day, is taxpayer money which will have to fill in that gap unless we find a way to magically disappear all our debt.

[-] daychilde@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Great points.

Not what I replied to, which AS A REMINDER was:

WE PAID THE TARRIFS AND WE PAID FOR THE REFUNDS

So again, you are another person replying that has not addressed the point I actually made to the comment to which I replied.

[-] bradinutah 34 points 2 days ago

Another reason to vote Blue in November. Hold R Senators and House Reps accountable for this and vote against them! They have enabled this grift.

[-] SippyCup@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago

Primary any Democrats unwilling to go hard for working class tax relief, true universal healthcare, paid parental leave, and prosecuting every person on the Epstein list. Bonus points if they condemn genocide in Palestine.

Accept nothing less.

[-] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

Getting late in the primary season for that one.

[-] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 13 points 1 day ago

Where is your cut?

Fucking hilarious, why would any taxpayer in the US ever expect a “cut?” The money is gone bro.

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Corporate america is more powerful than the government and the people. Why would they give you a cut? Do you not know about "shareholders" (the real scourge).

[-] Garbagio@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

... Says Second Largest Main Stream Media Conglomerate to Sane-wash Trump for over a Decade

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 3 points 2 days ago

That’s the neat part!

Why are people still posting cnn

I don't know. It's as much state-owned fascist crap as Fox News. I haven't clicked on it since Trump was elected. People say it's left wing but that is bullshit.

this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2026
343 points (99.4% liked)

politics

30787 readers
2203 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS