Do you have a source where I could read more about this? I tried looking all of this up and the only articles I found contradict the original comment about taking loans to repay tariffs and that putting tariff revenue into a sovereign wealth fund was proposed but never happened.

Edit: further reading shows neither is factual.

Forgive me for not understanding as I'm not from the US, but what happened to the funds from the collected tariffs?

Truth. I can't recall a single US president that wasn't at least implicated of war crimes. Not one of them was held accountable in the slightest.

The US - where anything more than the gentlest of softball questions is hard hitting journalism.

Is a mental handicap not eligible in the US?

It's a thorn, the confusion of which with a Y is the origin of 'Ye Olde Pub'.

@Sxan@piefed.zip, you're our only hope.

They know. They approve because he's hurting the 'right people.'

It's not defending a rich person, it's a statement of fact pertinent to the conversation.

Musk has most of his net worth in volatile investments. The total value of those investments once exceeded $1tn, but have lost value and no longer exceed $1tn. Therefore, he is no longer a trillionaire.

No other implications were made. Stop tilting at windmills.

Boop!

Is it though? Some people, myself included, actually use emdashes, though I'm usually just lazy and use a hyphen instead.

Or is something beyond the emdashes tipping you off?

There's a site that just came to my attention, worseonpurpose.com, that might appreciate this information.