341
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2026
341 points (99.4% liked)
politics
30787 readers
2431 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I keep hearing that, but I don't think it's true. Companies did pay money to the government, and now that money is being refunded to the companies.
The consumers get screwed, of course, but I think it's a single screwing, not a double one. Unless someone can show me something where companies are getting money they didn't pay out in the first place.
Edit: downvote but not tell me how you think we paid twice? Nice.
Are you saying prices didn't go up?
No. Dork. That is the money we paid.
We paid it once in higher prices. Not twice like claimed that I replied to.
You called me a name and it made me sad.
@fyzzlefry @daychilde Prices have gone up under President Trump, but not because of his policies. Food, electricity, & gas prices were already rising due to Biden-era inflation, supply chain issues, & massive government spending. Trump’s tariffs & deregulation are designed to bring prices down long-term by boosting domestic production & cutting costs. The left blames Trump for inflation that started before he took office.
This is the dumbest thing I've read. You owe me that chunk of my life back. How dare you.
You are crazy if you believe this bullshit 😆
I can't believe it. A comment so stupid that simply reading it has made me even stupider.
Not worth the effort.
I just now saw their response. I LOL'ed.
The wording I would say is correct more than it is wrong.
Companies did pay tariffs directly, and because of this I would say nearly all increased consumer pricing for effected goods, so indirectly people paid for those tariffs.
With the refunds going out, while ideally it would be a simple refund, the cost is performing the refunds (in man hours and potential transaction fees) which is the additional cost to taxpayers.
I would also say the number of companies deciding to send those refunds on to consumers is extremely low, they're just keeping the refund.
So it is definitely not regular people being "double dipped", which is what the original line may imply, but yeah, it's seemingly been used as a way for companies to make extra profit from people at the taxpayers expense.
This wording? The wording I replied to:
People absolutely paid for the tariffs in increased pricing.
The ovehead of the refunds would be insignificant.
The companies don't have to send any money to consumers to cancel us paying twice, because we paid once in high prices. If they hold on to the refunds, we will have still only paid once...... with higher prices.
So basically, what I said you don't even disagree with. And yet I got downvotes. Lemmy is quite irritating. People seem to prefer emotions over facts.
The revenue created by the tariffs was used as justification for legislation like the One Bill Ugly Bill as well. The double dip is that after everything, consumers have both less cash now and the growth of the federal deficit was accelerated even further. That, at the end of the day, is taxpayer money which will have to fill in that gap unless we find a way to magically disappear all our debt.
Great points.
Not what I replied to, which AS A REMINDER was:
So again, you are another person replying that has not addressed the point I actually made to the comment to which I replied.