543
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] SalamiDommie@lemmus.org 3 points 8 hours ago

Looks like Donut Media. A YT car channel I once live that sucks because they sold off to an investment group. And the investment group is really really bad at the content.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 20 points 21 hours ago

Have they tried painting a fire hydrant a truck and and a bicycle on the back? Let's test if these cameras are a robot or not.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 17 points 21 hours ago

To me, this looks a lot like taking one dose of a prescribed antibiotic. All it really succeeds in doing is training dazzle resistant strains of cameras.

Trying to trick the cameras is playing into an expensive game of cat and mouse. And sure, fine, that may work for a little while, but it's not a solution.

[-] callous_trog@lemmy.zip 131 points 1 day ago

Seems like a great way to get rear ended by a Tesla autopilot driver.

[-] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 97 points 1 day ago

Seems like a great way to get an insurance payout from a Tesla autopilot driver.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 17 points 21 hours ago

You don't need dazzle paint to get hit by a Tesla.

I live in an area where Tesla and Waymo both operate taxis. Waymo is actually pretty solid. Those cars are some of the best, most-predictable drivers on the road. Tesla cabs are meth-addicted clankers.

[-] Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 hours ago

The car reflect the owner?

[-] AgentSeven@lemmy.zip 31 points 1 day ago

Except insurance has basically decided it doesn't need to actually pay for the most part.

[-] WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

At some point people are just going to roll the dice on this bullshit. If they aren't gonna pay out when they should why are we even paying them? This seems incredibly criminal to deny payment while accepting increasing payments.

[-] Malyca@lemmy.zip 31 points 1 day ago

Wait till you hear about health insurance

[-] baines@lemmy.cafe 4 points 21 hours ago

seems like a plumb er solution

You're right, I should've waited... This is fucked.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

If they aren't gonna pay out when they should why are we even paying them?

Because you can end up losing your car, being fined thousands of dollars, or in jail for driving without insurance. The fact the peasants get no value from it isn't important, you better keep paying!

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 10 points 1 day ago

The figures don’t mean insurers rejected nearly half of otherwise valid claims. Claims can close without payment because another insurer covered the loss, a customer withdrew the claim, damages fell below the deductible or the loss wasn’t covered by the policy.

You can't just say this shit and then just dismiss it:

Still, the increase suggests motorists face greater scrutiny when seeking compensation for some of the most complicated and costly types of auto claims.

[-] kamee@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 day ago
[-] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago

Dude's probably on his way to the ATM machine

[-] daychilde@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Quick! What's his PIN number‽

[-] fleem@piefed.zeromedia.vip 6 points 1 day ago

nobody got it smh my head

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dwalin@lemmy.world 112 points 1 day ago
[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

I'm not a big fan of adapting to fascism, but sometimes you gotta do what you gotta do.

[-] Funwayguy@lemmy.world 75 points 1 day ago

This approach only works in daylight with cameras that rely on colour only. Infrared spectrum cameras such as what Australia uses on mobile phone traffic cameras are much harder to deal with. Patterns don't cut it and it's a huge part of military research into hiding vehicles from infrared spotters.

Disabling the cameras entirely is much more effective.

[-] MangoCats@feddit.it 9 points 1 day ago

For IR you can feasibly run IR dazzle lights all over whatever you want to mask, including your face.

[-] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

DO BOTH

(defense in depth)

[-] 4am@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago

Can’t you make patterns in infrared reflective paint?

[-] ag10n@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Here comes the sun, do do do do

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] gothic_lemons@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Dumb question I have no idea how infrared light works and cameras. But what if my license plate was just constantly firing infrared light to counter act or "blind" the cameras?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago

A fun experiment, but the real solution is preventing all the shit in the first place by government regulation.

I saw a post yesterday with practical suggestions about how to move that process along.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

We should just deregulate cutting them down.

[-] BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago

The same governments that are pocketing the sweet Flock dollars to ignore public opinion?

[-] blitzen@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

My solution so far is a bike rack that blocks my plate from view. Easy enough to feign ignorance and “correct it” in the moment. Flocks database no doubt has an entry for [color][make][model], but at least it’s not associated with me directly through motor vehicle bureau records.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

I’m pretty sure based on previous reporting that they will just track you as “blue car with this specific model of bike rack”.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] flandish@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

adding it also logs your phone, earpods, etc signals alongside the car’s data.

[-] plateee@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

Are you in one of the nice states that doesn't require front license plates?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

I wonder if WWI dazzle paint designs would work too.

[-] einkorn@feddit.org 27 points 1 day ago

Fighting fire with fire.

[-] decolo@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago

now find something that stops it from reading Bluetooth and other RF signals. I wonder if anyone has acquired one for security research

[-] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 7 points 1 day ago

It would be simpler to just overlay Bluetooth or RF signals it can read with signals so numerous and strong that it is overwhelmed. The main problem with that is the size of the hardware you'd need.

You could pull the 20 phones in a trench coat thing that one guy did to create "traffic jams" where there were no cars.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Spend a large sum (for some) of money to make my vehicle look stupid vs. they can fuck off with their privacy-invading cameras.

I prefer "they can fuck off"

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

I mean at least they're trying..? Your alternative isn't really a solution

Spend a large sum of money on a suit of armor vs. they can fuckin stab me

I prefer "they can fuckin stab me"

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2026
543 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

87080 readers
5008 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS