279
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] garretble@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

I wish DDG defaulted to their no ai search.

If they want to make silly little jokes about “the other guys and their ai” then maybe don’t use ai shit as your default search option on your own platform?

[-] twisted@sh.itjust.works 41 points 2 days ago

So it’s not anti-pervert then. It’s just non-pervert.

Anti-pervert would be something like sunglasses that zap the pervert sunglasses' cameras with lasers and damage the sensor. Maybe they don’t have to be so accurate.

[-] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 day ago

There are infrared reflecting glasses that blind cameras.

[-] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Does this work for flock cameras?

[-] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

Not sure. I assume they have a better IR filter than the small cameras used for the pervert glasses.

Although they may be IR sensitive because they also need to work at night though. Would need to see the technical specs.

[-] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Maybe a sort of anti pervert mesh network where gamma radiation is fired in the direction of whoever wears pervert glasses and eventually kills them with cancer.

It’s incredibly irresponsible and would have unintended consequences for otherwise innocent people but it would technically work so capitalism says ship it before China does!

[-] graynk@discuss.tchncs.de 61 points 2 days ago

Sooooo not anti-pervert and a generic publicity stunt. Haha please laugh etc. Don't have anything against DDG but can only roll my eyes at something like this

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 37 points 2 days ago

I mean, I'm not gonna buy them, but I still enjoy the dad joke.

[-] credo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Right. Anti-pervert glasses would at least require some lasers to meet the requisite qualifications.

[-] Malyca@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago

Sometimes corny is fun

[-] T3CHT@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago

Fair - it's marketing.
But it's good marketing - lambasts a stupid thing that people dislike to promote a product that is selling the opposite (privacy).
Good goal, and the marketing is clearly working here we are talking about it.

Also DDG browser is awesome on mobile and Windows. Blocks many ads and trackers, even on YT. Lightweight, wicked fast, offers not only private search but private AI chat.

Use DDG Because Gemini is SUPER creepy when it inserts personal info in unrelated questions. It keeps inserting my family details in answering unrelated questions now... Like a perv.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 2 days ago

I have only read the title but this just seems like.. Normal glasses then?

[-] Chozo@fedia.io 24 points 2 days ago

Yep. Just normal, AliBaba sunglasses.

[-] bluGill@fedia.io 10 points 2 days ago

Probably more expensive than AliBaba. Which might or might not mean better quality.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Carl@anarchist.nexus 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The real move would be to include polarized lenses or a holographic coating to block infrared facial ID cameras like Flock. Because most sunglasses don’t block the infrared spectrum, meaning something like a Flock camera can see right through them.

These are basically just a dad joke, based on the fact that meta has made every other pair of sunglasses “anti-pervert sunglasses” by default.

Yeah, well said. I wish someone would sell and manufacture actual anti surveillance glasses

[-] gsdsam@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

Are these what you are looking for?

https://www.reflectacles.com/

[-] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

"2. Only tech related news or articles."

[-] OozingPositron@feddit.cl -1 points 17 hours ago

How are glasses not technology?

[-] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

how did you miss my post saying they are?

[-] OozingPositron@feddit.cl 1 points 5 hours ago

Is that post within this same thread? I genuinely cannot see it, sometimes boost hides some comments for some reason. My bad.

[-] FerrisEuler@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago

While the headline doesn't discuss it, the article begins with "Meta has opened Pandora’s box with its AI-infused smart sunglasses. The pricy accessory has sparked a heated debate over privacy, with unsavory individuals abusing the eyewear’s easily-missed cameras to harass unsuspecting strangers in public — garnering the specs the distinctly unflattering nickname of “pervert glasses.”"

[-] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

"Zero AI, Cameras, or Even Electronics Whatsoever". but i conceded that manufacturing a lens and a frame qualifies as technology as far as i'm concerned

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

You have the reading comprehension of a toddler. The article is not about a pair of glasses, it’s about a tech company’s response to AI and surveillance, and how another company is irresponsibly using those things.

[-] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 1 points 17 hours ago

you actually look like a toddler

[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

...but does it have electrolytes?

[-] justabaldguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Brawdo's got what plants crave.

[-] fartographer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Unperverted Glasses

[-] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 days ago

“No camera, no microphone, no AI, no battery, no electronics of any kind,” Knockaround boasts on its website. “Just a beautifully crafted pair of matte black sunglasses with a glossy DuckDuckGo logo, designed to block the sun and never send data to the cloud

[-] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Meanwhile, I recently got new prescription glasses (after wearing my previous pairs for way too long, BTW) and got some that have an IR-blocking coating that's supposed to block face recognition cameras. Because that apparently needs to be a thing these days.

(I'm disappointed that these DuckDuckGo glasses don't have a similar special coating. I like the company I got mine from, but I'd like to see more companies offering privacy-enhancing tech.)

[-] sunnie@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 days ago

What, no company names to help out a fella?

[-] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I didn't want to give the appearance of shilling. But if you want to know, it's https://www.zennioptical.com/id-guard

There are apparently also similar products from "Reflectacles" and "Vaydr," but they were more expensive and/or not normal prescription glasses. The Zenni thing is just an extra coating you can add on to the glasses you would have otherwise bought anyway (which is how I found out about it; I didn't know it existed beforehand).

[-] sunnie@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 days ago

Thanks! It’s wild that this is a thing now. It’s like we’re living in a cyberpunk dystopia!

[-] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

Glasses without electronics? Then how will I see!?!

[-] FireWire400@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

$39 is probably still a huge markup.

[-] DrakeAlbrecht@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

They're barely making back the research costs of producing sunglasses without a lithium-polymer battery or a 12 megapixel CMOS camera.

THE ABOVE COMMENT IS SARCASM.
[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

there's no extra markup involved here for what is essentially a marketing thing.

they're $35. which is also the price the 'normal' (not 'collab' edition) ones sell for direct on ka's web site or at retailers like rei.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Is this now not not not the onion?

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 3 points 2 days ago
[-] gl38@feddit.uk 3 points 2 days ago

Is DuckDuckGo going down the DBrand/Wendy's model of irreverent, self aware marketing? I'm pretty tired of it being honest. Also, are they actually trying to make money from this? A satirical social media post would get the point across. But they're actually selling these for some reason.

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 8 points 2 days ago

Some company just placed DDG logo on existing model of glasses and is selling them for exact same price as a joke. It's not like DDG started manufacturing glasses specifically for this joke.

[-] gl38@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You make it sound like DDG aren't involved at all. They very much are.

It’s not like DDG started manufacturing glasses specifically for this joke.

No, it's like DDG started selling glasses specifically for this joke.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Ironically actual meta

[-] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Sold out and I can't seem to pre-order a pair for their next batch (maybe the next allotment is already sold out).

Oh well, my wallet wins this round.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] architect 0 points 1 day ago

This is so stupid. Ddg thinks their users are dumb as fuck. I’m sure they’re right.

[-] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Its just a marketing gimmick everyone knows they are just regular glasses. I think its just to make more people aware of Duck Duck Go in general and their general feelings on user privacy.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
279 points (94.6% liked)

Technology

86957 readers
4415 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS