Aside from the whole No-Shit-Sherlock aspect to this...
The strikes have killed at least 218 people, according to ABC News' count.
The Pentagon has spent over $820 million on the campaign
Really? More than 3.75 million dollars per "enemy" killed would be a complete boondoggle even if they were valid targets.
Jfc, I know I'm against this kind of thing, but for that money you could send me in on an old parachute with a revolver.
It's murder even if someone is likely involved in drug trafficking. Nobody involved has been tried or convicted, and the penalty for drug trafficking is not death in any civilized country.
Singapore would care to disagree
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_Singapore
The most recent execution conducted in Singapore took place on 23rd July 2026, when a 35 year old Singaporean was hanged for drug trafficking.[5]
Singapore's "justice" system isn't civilized, though. It's draconian to the point of barbarism.
Yeah most countries would disagree with Singapore, so I don't get the point they are making. Affirmation bias, probably.
You honestly think Singapore considers themselves... "civilized"?
The "civilized" qualifier was intentional.
I wouldn't call that place civilized
Elect conservatives (regressives), get war crimes.
And higher costs of living.
And more transmissible diseases.
And infringed rights.
Did you have your eyes closed whenever the dems were doing their war crimes?
I prefer my war crimes when they're limited to war zones and not entirely randomly across the globe.
You are in fact right, but given a binary choice between war crimes, or war crimes AND Fascists, I'm afraid the right choice is war crimes without the side order of Fascism.
BoTh SiDeS
What's a war crime if it's never punished?
To the shock of absolutely no one who has been paying attention.
Bombing before a trial, what could go wrong
Likely war crime
The double-tap was definitely a war crime. Attacking people in the water after their vessel was hit is literally the example they use in the part of the US Navy's manual in the section where they define war crimes.
Way to be 8 months behind, dipshit. As one of my two senators, what are you doing about it? As one of the senators who voted to reopen the government when everybody was on board with keeping it shut down until the right shit got funded, are you starting to understand how fucking wrong you were? Do something of value or fuck off.
The government’s reaction to the Trump regime reeks of weaponized incompetence.
Because it is
He wrote a letter to Trump!
What do you expect him to do? Loudly demand that this war be ended TODAY, and loudly demand that his fellow Democrats join him, and vote against EVERYTHING until this war is fully ended, close down the government, close down everything until we stop committing world-class terrorism?
Nah, a letter should do it.
A letter that gives Trump an out by saying he didn't order anything illegal. About as useful as herpes.
Way to be 8 months behind, dipshit
Tbf, that's almost 34 years further than the "every election takes place in 1992" Clintonite "Centrist" bastard usually is 🤷🏻
Usually you have this thing called due process that helps you figure out whether or not the accused are actually criminals.
Not in international waters, you don’t.
There, the US gets to kill brown people indiscriminately.
/sad
Little late to the party, eh, Tim? Just like the rest of your stupid friends.
This loser is part of the problem.
I am Jack's complete lack of suprise.
Really? Shocked I tell you shocked.
NO FUCKING SHIT
Has America killed innocent American citizens before in order to achieve a goal of theirs?
Every day. That isn't even new for this administration, although they're more open about not giving a fuck that it happens, and that it's part of the plan.
Ya but they were brown people. No one will be held accountable. Wish I was joking.
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News