307
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by roserose56@lemmy.zip to c/world@lemmy.world
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 1 hour ago

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2026/jul/17/gianni-infantino-fifa-reelection-more-than-200-countries-endorse-despite-balogun-scandal

Gianni Infantino has the formal endorsement of more than 200 Fifa members for re-election as the body’s president despite the climate of unrest that has swirled since the scandal surrounding Folarin Balogun’s reprieve from suspension.

The Guardian understands only a handful of Fifa’s 211 member associations are still to send letters of support for Infantino, who is on course to be voted into a fourth term by a landslide at its congress in March [2027].

[-] itsjustachairmary@lemmy.world 36 points 22 hours ago

Too corrupt for FIFA. He should get a FIFA prize for that. Quite the achievement.

[-] ZeroCool@piefed.ca 147 points 1 day ago

Oh no... I hope this doesn't jeopardize the annual FIFA Peace Prize that was totally going to happen next year and wasn't just some one-off openly corrupt bullshit meant to stroke the ego of a senile narcissist.

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Its pronounced: FIFA Piece (of Shit) Prize

[-] BillyClark@piefed.social 21 points 1 day ago

If I was taking over FIFA today and trying to fix its status as being perhaps the most famous example of corruption in the world today, I would actually give out the phoney baloney peace prize a few more times before stopping.

That way, you wouldn't have the only recipient ever be one who started many wars the next year. And you could say that you plan on giving out five or ten more prizes to try to atone for giant "mistake" with the first one.

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

I'd retroactively take the other one back, make a big deal about how trump is one of the least peaceful people, then not give it out again.

Having a fake award that was only made only to stroke your ego, removed very publicly, has to suck a lot more than receiving it in the first place.

[-] BillyClark@piefed.social 11 points 23 hours ago

If you're taking it back, you know what would be amazing? Take back the one Trump got and give it to somebody else.

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 18 points 23 hours ago

Give it to Obama, lol. Not that he deserves it, but it would be the ultimate middle finger.

[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 8 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)
[-] YouTalkinToMe@lemmy.wtf 3 points 12 hours ago

Give it to him five years straight. Lol. Even if he doesn't ever come to collect. Just keep announcing it on stage.

[-] MrNesser@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

Nah I'd make a statement that FIFA has never had such a prize and if one had been given out it was worthless.

Remember FIFA got it's world cup in the USA and trump is out in 2 years there's no need for them to bow down anymore.

[-] SilverCode@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago

And give it to random people, not anyone note worthy. Like, team up with McDonalds to run a competition to win a FIFA peace prize or something.

Buy a Big Mac Meal and you qualify to enter the draw for your own FIFA Peace Prize.

[-] ZeroCool@piefed.ca 7 points 1 day ago

Given how much McDonald's Trump eats, odds are he'd still win it under those rules.

[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 4 points 22 hours ago

It'd be like that rich kid who's daddy owned the factory in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory...but with Big Macs.

Except he'd be doing it with tax dollars.

[-] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 61 points 1 day ago

But where will they find someone else with a head shaped like a football

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I'm sure Stewie Griffin would be both available, and less corrupt than the last few leaders of FIFA

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

~~Charlie Brown, then. He'd be even less corrupt than Stewie~~

[-] Rekhyt@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Different football shape, though

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Charlie Brown, then. He'd be even less corrupt than Stewie

[-] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

good - better late than never

[-] ivan@piefed.social 21 points 1 day ago

Yup, he should’ve been shown the door back when he suggested getting Russians back into tournaments.

What a surprise that this clown would so many more fuck-ups afterwards. 🗿

[-] fascistno1hater@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago

No, he should be investigated, arrested and then be put in prison. By allowing these corrupt people to just resign you are setting yourself up for failure in the future. We have to hold these people accountable because otherwise there will be others who will pick up this mantle and try this again.

America is a perfect example.

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

You know it's bad when you are looking back at the Sepp Blatter era with a bit of nostalgia. Blatter was awful. But somehow they found an even worse replacement.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

But the U.S. will immediately declare war on football, invade Switzerland, and rename the sport "soccer" once and for all....

The cheese will end up tasting bland and insipid, too....

/s, of course—fuck that orange pedo and his despicable minions anyway.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

We didn't name it soccer. That was the brits. Soccer just stuck over here.

[-] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago

Only because you already had that other sport where you thrown around the large egg.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

As I understand it, it was because they had multiple leagues of various types of football, and they were trying to differentiate soccer from the other leagues.

[-] Rekhyt@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

It was "association football" as opposed to "rugby football".

[-] Tango@piefed.ca 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And the American sport whose full name is "gridiron football". And the Irish sport whose full name is "gaelic football". And the Australian sport known as "Aussie rules football". And the Irish-Australian sport known as "compromise rules football". And...

[-] scytale@piefed.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Why don’t they just vote to oust him?

[-] Akasazh@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

There's many insignificant football countries that have a vote, but that are corrupt af, those all vote for him.

The European countries don't have the vote required to oust him, but they account for the most significant football nations. They might have found their collective bargaining power as if they leave fifa is nothing.

[-] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

The swing vote is conmebol, South America has all the non-european teams people want to see, they are pretty corrupt but not FIFA levels of corrupt and if they piss off the fans too much, they're in trouble.

[-] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Because all the voting members have equal votes. So the tiny banana republic nations for whom the proposed $30m payment represents a significant amount of their GDP get the same vote as England, for which it represents only half of the FA’s annual profit.

UEFA members have 55 votes out of 211. Assuming all members toe the line, they can easily call a vote of no confidence (requires 20%) but to win the vote they need 106 votes. Earlier this month 200 associations had formally backed Infantino to run for his final term next spring.

this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2026
307 points (99.7% liked)

World News

57349 readers
1089 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS