Seeing this post for the second time and thinking about it more it gave me a really uncomfortable feeling about how men are defining sexuality in women, taking away that agency of the women themselves. It’s very invasive it makes me so uncomfortable.

Obviously this has been happening all throughout history, and it’s already normalised that men obsess over women who are visible in media to the point that they stalk and harass them, because they perceive the visibility of these women as a sort of sexual invitation. But the largest social media platform taking away the livelihood of these women and saying their voice is sexual, when the content is intended for general comfort feels worse somehow. It just made me realise how uncomfortably close we are to a society that finds just the existence women already sexual, in combination with capitalism that would be a horrific reality.

My tinfoil hat conspiracy here is that they are banning them so that they can push AI generated ASMR stuff.

“But let’s not lay a finger on the nazis! They make us too much money telling people what they want to hear!”

Banning people for being conditiobally attractive. Lovely.

Hopefully YouTube kills itself and we move to a fediverse peertube where they can't mass censor leftists.

apparently not even having sex is too kinky now

every political streamer is my kink... now we have to ban them all.

You tube? That sounds dirty. No "tubing" on my watch, creep

what if they banned ASML videos in preparation of the era of chinese semiconductor supremacy

Uh-oh, looks like all my favourite Yoga and "stretches for lower back pain" videos are in danger :(

So far, YouTube creators affected by the wave of bans who’ve spoken publicly about YouTube removing their channels include ItsBunniiASMR, Slight Sounds, Nananightray, Roseasmr, Simoneasmr, and Janina Wilhelmsen

At least four of them had a direct link to their (erotic) OnlyFans either in the channel's or videos' descriptions.