The argument the mod writes is 👌

Update : there’s a new one that appears but, I’ve checked, that’s the same mod as the others

Update 2 : got contacted by the mod, overall sweet guy/gal we agree to disagree and keep the ban up, who said that Lemmy cannot be civil

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 114 points 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 102 points 2 months ago (10 children)

    Lol, they think the computers in star trek were just LLMs

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Imagine if the computer on star trek operated the way it does in every episode where the computer is malfunctioning. That's how real-world "AI" works. You ask to go to the bridge and it keeps sending your ass to engineering and ten forward.

    Also: They didn't even mention Data who is more AI than even the ship's computer!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    After Tesseract and now this, it raises a question. Do people that call themselves conservatives have to always be contrarians?

    Literally any topic. There were issues that one would think everyone would agree on and they still surprise you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 84 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Communities, not instances. Startrek.website is one instance, lemmy.today is another. An instance hosts communities. Also, no point censoring the names since the modlog is public.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 63 points 2 months ago* (19 children)

    It happens when you post here, you don't even have to interact with their community. Instead they come here, by their own volition, to be angry about us not liking AI and they then decide to ban every name they come across. This community existing is insult enough for them. Thankfully they self-isolate for the most part.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (13 children)

    are you saying people here may have been banned by communities without even knowing? fascinating :o I wouldn't even know how to check that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 45 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    You claim to hate AI in real life but like AI in SciFi. Curious.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 34 points 2 months ago (18 children)

    lol I got similar treatment by those dipshits a few months ago

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago (12 children)

    bdzer0's claim to be anarchist yet wholly embracing AI is some cognitive dissonance that I cannot wrap my head around.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 27 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    This isn't about AI - that's just an excuse.

    What they really didn't want was a Tribble infestation, and well, given your username...you can see why they might want you to keep your distance...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    Yeah, where is my ship computer anyway? The duotronic circuits, Holodeck Moriarty, an LCARS panel in the hallway and a pad in my readyroom? Why do I have to constantly refill the coffee beans, empty the collection container, do the descale program and the machine doesn't just provide me with "coffee, black" whenever I like? Feels like it's handing out even more quests to me than any Voyager storywriter could imagine. I'm also waiting for ages on tablets which can just flick over the app and data to my colleagues like in Stargate SG1.

    Edit: Also dunno, I can't remember how in Star Trek, all the AI is done by big, nasty corporations. Gobbles up half the hardware so it becomes unaffordable to people and they build a big, dirty gas powered datacenter next to Picard's family's wineyard. And then Voyager's ship computer ceases to work the moment they drop out of wifi range?! Did I miss those episodes?

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 2 months ago

    Oh no, AI slop will be removed from your feed? However will you survive‽

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    These people understand Star Trek is fictional, often takes place on quasi-military vessels, and depicts a society that has some significant differences from our own, right?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] [S] 22 points 2 months ago (7 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)

    And yet Star Trek still had to have a human being repeat all what the A.I. was saying to make sure that it wasn't shite.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 21 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    You don’t need to redact your rap sheet, it’s public.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 21 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    LCARS was a data access and retrieval system capable of doing calculations and simulations. It was not, I REPEAT, was not "artificial intelligence". It did not try to act or sound sentient, it simply responded to commands and ran programs.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 17 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    The computers in Star Trek didn’t (normally) hallucinate, so they’re definitely not LLMs.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 15 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Most people aren’t anti ai, but rather anti llm.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 15 points 2 months ago

    Obviously I’m not enough of an AI hater cause I ain’t been banned from shit.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago

    The computers in Star Trek are fictional. They work because the plot needs them too. They do not resemble a large language program because they don't resemble anything. You might as well say CSI: Miami's enhance image computer is AI.

    The mod who typed that up might as well just declare from the rooftops, "I fell for a Silicon Valley marketing trick of describing software with a sci-fi tropes."

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago

    Badge of fucking honor.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago
    [–] 12 points 2 months ago*

    Isn't "post-scarcity society" a big part of star trek too? Weird to claim you are a star trek fan while defending "scarcity generator 3000."

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago

    Congrats! Every ban from ai bullshit is a badge of honor.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago

    I don't remember “the computers” being AI. Holograms and androids? Sure. But for the computers be that level of AI would throw Trek into dystopia.

  • source
  • [–] [S] 10 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    My AI is better than yours, it’s doing pottery

    the Real thingMajel Barrett in Spectre (1977)

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 2 months ago

    You must be doing something right lmao

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago

    Being banned from these cesspools should be a badge of honor.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago

    Everytime they try AI systems in trek it starts blowing up starships.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    You're in welcome company.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›