[–] 7 points 1 day ago

As our car sizes grow, new evidence points to pedestrian risk

Car sizes have grown for decades.

You may have noticed that big cars are popular in Australia.

Sales of sedans and hatchbacks have followed the US trend into a long-term decline, changing the shape of our national passenger fleet.

Pedestrian deaths have started rising in the US and, to a lesser extent, in Australia, leading to questions about the effects of this shift in popular car design.

new study of more than 10,000 crashes could provide some clues.

To see how cars have changed, let's compare different car models over the years.

You will see them get longer and heavier, but when it comes to the safety of the woman and child pictured, the most important dimension to watch is their height.

Older cars tended to be lower with sloping bonnets.

When we turn back the clock to 2005, the most popular car was the sedan.

You can see the woman is taller than the car, which is less than 1.5 metres high and weighs nearly 1.7 tonnes.

If she were to be hit by it, the impact would likely be lower on her body — for example, her legs or waist — rather than her head.

By 2015, medium SUVs like this one were becoming popular.

Ten years later, SUVs are on the rise.

This is a 2015 medium SUV at a height of 1.7m and it tips the scales about the same point as the sedan from 10 years ago.

So, it's not huge.

SUV sales overtook more traditional cars in 2017 and have continued growing in popularity … and size.

New Australian research shows that as our vehicle height grows, the risk to pedestrians does too.

For every 10cm of vehicle height, the odds of a pedestrian death rise by 11 per cent.

Utility vehicles were the highest selling cars last year.

Last year, this ute was the most popular choice among Australian buyers.

At about 1.9m, it's 30cm higher than the average woman or 15cm taller than the average Australian man. This means it towers over most pedestrians.

The pick-up truck has started becoming more popular in recent years.

And as our car trends follow the US, these large pick-up trucks are also becoming more common on our roads.

This 2026 model stands about 2m high and weighs up to 3 tonnes.

And while they can be useful for towing or other heavy-duty jobs, the reality is that many are spending time in heavily populated areas.

You will have noticed the bonnet shape change over the years, from low and sloping to higher and blunter.

A US study of crash data found that for every 10cm increase in front-end height, the risk of pedestrian death increased by 22 per cent, with women, children and seniors more at risk than other people.

Australian crash data showed no significant association between vehicle height and weight, and men's fatality risk.

But for women, an increase in either of those two dimensions became "significant predictors of death", according to the researchers (more so for height than weight).

We don't have bonnet-height crash data in Australia, but we do now have analysis linking taller cars to increased risk of death.

Will Australia continue to follow US trends?

Like the US, the number of pedestrian deaths in Australia has risen in the past five years (after years of trending down), while the fatality rate for passengers inside a vehicle has roughly stabilised.

Melbourne University researchers wanted to explore if there was a particular factor behind this trend.

They looked at 10,376 crashes between 2012 and mid-2025 in Victoria, including details such as vehicle type, road environment, speed limits, time of day and the characteristics of drivers and pedestrians involved.

When looking at vehicle type, they found station wagons carried a probability of pedestrian death 1.2 times that of passenger cars such as sedans and hatchbacks, and for utes the figure was 1.6 times.

When they modelled the outcome of crashes that only differed in vehicle size, they found that every 100kg of vehicle weight increased fatality odds by 6 per cent, and for every 10cm of vehicle height, the odds of a pedestrian death rose by 11 per cent.

The previous US study's finding on overall height was weaker than the Australian figures (6.6 per cent increase in fatality odds per 10cm of height), suggesting if Australian data on front-end height was available, it could show a stronger fatality association than the US data.

University of Melbourne associate professor Milad Haghani, one of those behind the Australian study, says one of the main reasons for the increased risk is the point of impact on a human body.

"If the point of the crush is to the upper part of the pedestrian's body, and also if the pedestrian doesn't end up on the bonnet and instead ends up on the ground hitting their head on the concrete, those are elements that can increase the likelihood of fatality," he says.

They found women were disproportionately impacted because they were, on average, shorter than men, so their head and torso were at a critical point of impact.

Dr Haghani explains that a crucial finding was that the fatality risk remained, even in lower-speed crashes.

"These are otherwise survivable crashes that are turning fatal as a result of vehicle design."

Researchers estimate that if cars remain at those early and mid-2000s heights and weights, it could save about 9 per cent of the lives lost.

"Some people might say that: 'Oh, well, you're at a higher level as a driver, you should see that,' but that is not the case," Dr Haghani says.

"You see further down the road where it doesn't matter, but you don't see much right in front of your vehicle, which matters the most."

Last year, the Australasian New Car Assessment Program (ANCAP) tested five large utes as part of its safety rating process.

The utes all met Australia's road vehicle standards, but ANCAP chief executive Carla Hoorweg says there could be improvements.

She says improving safety is about ensuring vehicles have the right crash-avoidance technology to prevent a collision in the first place.

ANCAP testing with a dummy child pedestrian.(Supplied: ANCAP Safety)

ANCAP Safety testing the Ford F-150.(Supplied: ANCAP Safety)

ANCAP testing the Chevrolet Silverado 1500(Supplied: ANCAP Safety)

The utes underperformed in simulated scenarios of a child running in front of the vehicles at night and the driver's vision while the utes were turning.

"Where we see vehicles falling short is that they tend to have the technology, but it doesn't work in the breadth of scenarios of vulnerable road user dummies," Ms Hoorweg says.

Ms Hoorweg says one of the biggest risks to pedestrians is older cars that don't have as many safety features as newer vehicles.

Victoria Police Road Policing Assistant Commissioner Mick Hermans says too many pedestrians are being killed or seriously injured, but there is a range of factors at play.

"We tend to see a mix of both drivers and pedestrians at fault in fatal pedestrian collisions, with drivers most likely to fail to give way to pedestrians, while pedestrians are opting to cross a road mid-block rather than at a designated crossing," he says.

He says motorists need to pay attention to their surroundings, especially in built-up areas, and pedestrians need to look up when crossing the road and use designated crossings.

So what are the solutions?

The National Transport Research Organisation has called for a review into the safety standards of large utes.

ANCAP is working on its next three-year vehicle safety protocols, which could include factors such as bonnet height, use of technology, automatic or advanced emergency braking and car design.

The Melbourne University researchers propose a range of solutions, including removing tax concessions, revising import safety regulations, and introducing specific licence conditions for large vehicles.

"The big cars have the momentum, and without any change in policy, the momentum is not going to go away," Dr Haghani says.

"Right now, there is no disincentive to go and buy big."

Credits

Reporting: Andie Noonan

Visual production and additional reporting: Margie Burin

Design: Emma Machan

Development: Josh Byrd

Editing: Cristen Tilley

  • source
  • submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by to c/ausrenovation@aussie.zone
     

    This is a dividing wall between what's gonna be a home brewery and the subfloor - what would be a good way to block off the top of this wall?

    More pics

    Not worried about ventilation, this part will obviously have a lot of extraction, and the rest of the underhouse has its own vents and is pulled through the garage via a subfloor fan (plus there's a doorway out of shot). This is more to mitigate migration of dust and shizz.

     

    We're running a mix of zigbee/matter as the network's been building out, but we're needing to expand both into the subfloor and basement brewery. Looking at possibly needing a hub to extend the signal (yay 60's brick and lead paint), anyone have any recs for Australia? I'm looking chiefly at Dialed In and while Tuya have several models they've rather shat the bed for me with their practises so eyeing off alternates.

     

    Please excuse the mess, literally halfway through cleaning and repointing

    This is the basement brewery, where the new sink will go - the upper section is going to be clad in upvc cleat wall over the sink, the bottom meter or so - well this is the question.

    We want to clad it over, what would be the best material? Blueboard? Villa? Cement sheeting? Preferably paintable as the sink is an industrial open base, so we're planning on running exposed copper over it. What size airgap would be needed over the brick? Standard 25mm?

    We really don't want this wall exposed, every other wall down there is brick anyway so fuckit.

     

    Hi all. I got the tank overflow conundrum sorted, complete with a three way tap so I can run overflow to the gutter or to a storage bin to track to other tanks. Lotta swearing, handful of dodgy chinese parts and a lotta fun

    Of course me being me I couldn't fckin stop there, and have built in a float system, so if the bin hits capacity it automatically diverts everything else to the stormwater - but I'm not too happy with the flow through the float. It's definitely limiting.

    Anyone rec a wide bore low pressure float? There's like,maybe half a bar of pressure on this thing, so it really needs to be something that's gonna let everything through until it bobs up and shuts off.

    current one in use

    submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by to c/ausrenovation@aussie.zone
     

    Working on the never-ending basement brewery and we have this: old piping installation holes, leading into the kitchen above.

    That grey subfloor is asbestos hardiboard. We are going to eventually redo the kitchen - just not this year (priorities, man!) what would be the best way to cover this from the basement side? gut says just gluepaint to encapsulate and a piece of ply to hide the holes, sound idea?

    Edit: ok cos there seems to be repeated confusion: These are holes in the CEILING of a basement brewery leading to the asbestos floored kitchen ABOVE.

    Rainwater plumbing (thelemmy.club)
    submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by to c/ausrenovation@aussie.zone
     

    Ok chucklefucks i hope you like homebrew!

    We currently have a set of maze tanks down the side of the house. They fill up pretty rapidly, so when we're looking at good rainfall i swap the overflow out to an old greywater wheeliebin to pump to other tanks / use in garden. You can see the temp setup from yesterday's rain - the flow to stormwater is on the right, the temp plugged vinidex to the bin on the left

    I'm looking to make this process easier than plugging/unplugging plumbing, so was planning on putting in a T with the side to an outlet I can clip an18mm hose onto for the bin, and the down with a ball valve underneath (then leading to the stormwater to cut over to binfill vs stormwater as opposed to my current screw/unscrew/can't curve the poly that much so it takes up half the pathway. Simples, yes?

    But then i had An Idea. The top links between the tanks are a PITA. Always dribbling, don't feed through very much, would be a gigantic pain to redo as they're very tight and the bottom link is cemented...so what if i tied in the bottom link (white pipe at the bottom left) at a slightly lower height than that top overflow, which would stop the top links hitting regular capacity, but be able to use them during high flood.

    So: standpipe from bottom linking pipe to tie into the top overflow, then work in a tee and a valve so I can cut over the flow from stormwater to bin....workable?

     

    cross-posted from: https://aussie.zone/post/15458542

    I made a spreadsheet on info and pricing for every mobile plan in Australia (that I could find)

    Made a spreadsheet of mobile plan data so people could compare providers and plans easily. I plan to update it either yearly or every 6 months. This was inspired by this spreadsheet on all the NBN plan pricing information: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_wnaTFb_3QsdgZfKDrEO6D_Rpzt2clbB/edit?gid=1523306688#gid=1523306688

     

    In just over two years, their small Hamilton-based business, Sustainable Plastic Solutions, has reclaimed 3,000 tonnes of plastic and has created a world-leading closed-loop circular economy for grain tarpaulins.

    They've just received a federal grant for matched funding of $9 million that will expand their operations to 16,000 tonne capacity per year and should enable them to tackle the so-far-unsolvable problem of recycling silage wrap.

    But in the beginning, it was all financed by local farmers.

    view more: next ›