380
Got ban from a bunch of AI instances (thelemmy.club)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
128 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The argument the mod writes is 👌

Update : there’s a new one that appears but, I’ve checked, that’s the same mod as the others

Update 2 : got contacted by the mod, overall sweet guy/gal we agree to disagree and keep the ban up, who said that Lemmy cannot be civil

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 21 points 2 months ago (6 children)

LCARS was a data access and retrieval system capable of doing calculations and simulations. It was not, I REPEAT, was not "artificial intelligence". It did not try to act or sound sentient, it simply responded to commands and ran programs.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    There is at least one instance where it was written as sapient in TNG. That was mostly for a joke, though. Specifically, there was a running gag in early TNG with Data getting a bit too into defining things and someone (usually Picard) would interrupt him with something along the lines of, "Thank you, Data, we get it." In one scene, Data is alone and only talking to the computer, which gives the line there.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago*

    TOS had the m5, which went rogue and started attacking and blowing up other starships, and lower decks had the Texas class, which went rogue and started attacking other starships

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Though it could create intelligence. "Computer, make an opponent that can be better than data". Ok, guess it's time to make a sentient hologram then.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    But that could only be done if the method do so had been stored as a program in the databanks. In Voyager, when they try to replicate The Doctor; Harry writes a program and then tells the computer to run that program. When the hologram fails, he has to reprogram it and run again.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    It's not like Star Trek is the most consistent over time.

    In Voyager, they did tend to treat the Doctor with more care and show that it was a lot of hard work. By extension the other sentient holograms.

    In TNG, they absolutely just casually upgraded a run of the mill holodeck NPC to a sentient being with a single supremely vague directive.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent