76
submitted 8 hours ago by Pip@feddit.org to c/europe@feddit.org
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 9 points 3 hours ago

NB: Politico is part of the right-wing agenda Axel Springer group.

Not sure why they picked out Palantir, but the "vow" (i.e. agreement) is about much more than Palantir, in fact, the company is mentioned nowhere in it.

β€œTo foster data sovereignty, France and Germany will examine the development of a European sovereign digital backbone, taking into consideration data-centric security, artificial intelligence and cloud solutions from both countries,” the two countries said in a joint declaration Friday after talks between Friedrich Merz and Emmanuel Macron.

I'm still not a friend of European mass surveillance or even AI in general, but the above sounds mostly good and necessary.

[-] Bababasti@feddit.org 45 points 6 hours ago
[-] aproposnix@piefed.social 1 points 52 minutes ago
[-] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 25 points 6 hours ago

Yay, European mass surveillance!!!!!

[-] oneser@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

Champions League theme song plays in background

[-] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 37 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I've decided to take on Saruman with an even bigger orc army. Also, my big eyeball has a corrective lens.

[-] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 5 hours ago

Only that the EU has to buy the corrective lens, aka AI technology, from the US. Collecting the data is the easy part, processing is the difficult part.

Besides, are the US going to share all data? Without their own Whatsapp and Facebook, and mobile operating systems, the EU doesn't have the same user tracking data.

[-] x1gma@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

So, they want to develop a rival, huh?

  • no actual sources for data, compared with american companies like Google, Meta, etc.
  • lack of experts without ethics, who have the skillset required and have no ethical objections building this
  • no infrastructure of this size
  • no european frontier models

Or, in less technical, no data to process, no developers to build it, nowhere to run this on, and no technical means to analyze that data.

I can't see how this is not gonna be a gigantic waste of money, that could've been spent on literally anything else that would work better and that Europe would actually benefit from.

[-] kugel7c@feddit.org 1 points 12 minutes ago

Idk the BND and its French equivalent can largely buy up the exact same data sources the Americans are buying as well.

I agree that it's kind of a waste in terms of why would we want mass surveillance at home. But believing the EU can't do this from a tech /resource perspective is rather shortsighted. Now a German French co-production running super smoothly especially at the start is also unlikely but they probably will get there at some point.

[-] pdxfed@lemmy.world 23 points 8 hours ago
[-] flamingos@feddit.uk 7 points 7 hours ago

Is that a threat?

this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2026
76 points (93.2% liked)

Europe

11610 readers
792 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS