Trump fired all three remaining members of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission on Thursday, abruptly disabling the only federal agency devoted solely to election administration at a moment when Trump has sought to reshape federal voting rules.

The two Democratic commissioners, Thomas Hicks and Benjamin Hovland, were notified by email. “On behalf of President Donald J. Trump, I am writing to inform you that your position as Commissioner of the Election Assistance Commission is terminated, effective immediately. Thank you for your service,” the email said. It was signed by Morgan DeWitt Snow, deputy director of presidential personnel in the Executive Office of the President.

The third commissioner, Republican Christy McCormick, was allowed to resign, according to three sources within the agency. McCormick declined to comment when reached by phone. The agency’s fourth commissioner, Republican Donald Palmer, voluntarily departed the agency earlier this year to join the Heritage Foundation.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 225 points 2 months ago (12 children)

They're not even going to pretend to count the votes, are they?

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 161 points 2 months ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 141 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    There's TONS of ELECTION FRAUD so we need to FIRE the ONLY people who's ENTIRE JOBS are to MONITOR these Crimes!

    -Republicans LITERALLY!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 95 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    "Maybe you do not care much about the future of the Republican Party. You should. Conservatives will always be with us. If conservatives become convinced that they can not win democratically, they will not abandon conservatism. They will reject democracy."

    David Frum

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    The fact that we didn't imprison him and every other Bush lackey is a big part of why we're in our current situation

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago

    I'd argue it was the failure to prosecute the separatists following the Civil War that was the original sin. The laws and precedents that would've been set in the process of prosecuting Confederate leaders and political supporters would've prevented a lot of the should-be-illegal insurectionist actions that have been ignored as "performative" for decades

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 86 points 2 months ago (20 children)

    i think it's so funny how americans think they live in a democracy while one guy just fires whomever he wants.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • load more comments (18 replies)
    [–] 78 points 2 months ago

    This is not a red flag in any way...

  • source
  • [–] 77 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    Called it. As soon as the Supreme Court gave their ruling on hiring/firing within independent agencies, I figured the FEC/EAC would be screwed. Godddamn, I hate this administration.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 74 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (15 children)

    Welp.

    We lived long enough to see America become a 3rd world shithole.

    Edit: Don't care if I get banned. This traitor's head needs to be on a pike.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] [S] 68 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    The Commission is tasked with testing and certification but they're supposed to report to Congress every two years, handle federal funds, and handle communication on laws, procedures, etc.

    Based on this news, Trump is so desperate to avoid accountability that he doesn't even want to hold a pretend election, like North Korea does.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 56 points 2 months ago

    This is it. His big move. It's all out in the open now and the endgame is midterms. C'mon citizens of all stripes, choose neighbourhood reps to watch and video all the polling booths on election day. You'll need that insurance.

  • source
  • [–] 48 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    I never thought in my lifetime the United States would need "International Observers".

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah that's for countries that don't respect democracy, not.... Oh nevermind.

    I'm not sure the last time I saw the phrase international observers offhand (I am sure it's happened but just missed it) but they are definitely needed in that country. They seem to be degrading themselves to third world, in function if not by cold war meaning.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 45 points 2 months ago* (10 children)

    Thanks SCOTUS!

    This right here is the final straw. Cancelling the independence of federal agencies will turn this nation into a capitalist MAGA shithole faster than anything else he's done.

    I used to believe that we needed to add 4 seats to SCOTUS, but I no longer believe that. Now I believe that we need to add at least 20 seats to SCOTUS, with rolling term limits. The count shouldn't be so close that one bad faith president can negatively manipulate policy for the next century. It should include rolling term limits, so every president gets to appoint a few, but not enough to steer the direction of the court.

    We have to strengthen the independence of the three branches of government, and this is how we do it for SCOTUS.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 43 points 2 months ago (13 children)

    Dude is trying to steal the next election and install himself as king, amd we're all just shrugging our shoulders. Let's see how that works out for us.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (13 replies)
    [–] 38 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Really interested to know why nobody near this guy has any spine whatsoever.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 37 points 2 months ago (50 children)

    They should still show up to work and do their jobs. I highly doubt they answer directly to the executive branch, or that the president even has the power to terminate them.

    How were they selected in the first place? Are they elected, appointed, or hired? By whom? These are the questions that matter.

    If they report to Congress, then I'm guessing at a minimum that it would take an act of congress to fire them. Not that republicans wouldn't do it if trump asks, but there's a narrow enough majority that a few spoiler votes could block it.

    We need to stop letting trump get away with usurping the powers of the other branches of government.

  • source
  • hideshow 50 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 2 months ago* (11 children)

    JFC, you are so behind the times. The fact that you are getting upvotes is scary. Obviously, many people don't know that American life as they know it, was effectively destroyed a week ago.

    Remember the other day, when there was all that talk about Birthright Citizenship being BARELY upheld by SCOTUS? A case that was so obvious that it NEVER should have been brought, to say nothing making it all the way to the SCOTUS, where it inexplicably had 4 votes against it?

    That vote was a red herring, a distraction. The important case, the one that got 10% of the coverage of Birthright Citizenship, was the one that struck down the independence of nearly EVERY independent agency (over 2 dozen) that regulates EVERYTHING in our country. Now the president can fire anybody, in any agency, for any reason. ALL government regulation is now in the hands of Donald Trump.

    That means pharmaceuticals, food, air, water, transportation safety, roads, buildings, mail, workplace safety, etc. literally EVERYTHING in this country that requires regulations to remain safe, are up to Donald Trump. So if the meat industry wants to pay off Donald Trump to loosen safety standards, he'll take the bribe, and let them write their own rules, and we'll be eating horsemeat and dogmeat labelled as beef, and it will be perfectly legal, so don't bother to sue.

    BTW, the ONLY agency that SCOTUS protected was the Federal Reserve, which was the one agency Trump really wanted to get his hands on. But the Sociopathic Oligarchs who make these decisions were smart enough to keep the MONEY out of Trump's hands. They WANT him to fuck up everything else, and make our lives miserable, but they aren't going to let him fuck up THEIR money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 23 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    Civil disobedience is probably one of the best tools of resistance at this point. If he's doing blatantly antidemocratic stuff, his orders no longer carry democratic legitimacy and should not be followed. They only have weight if people obey. Sure, he might send someone to remove them from office forcibly, but it would contribute to cracks in his image of power.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
  • load more comments (23 replies)
    [–] 36 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Almost nothing in voting is done by executive agencies so the vote stealing impact of this is going to be more indirect.

    Maybe destroying this agency is to try to give a parallel fascist agency validity. Or maybe he thinks he can nominate Jared and Ivanka as Democrats. Or maybe he just doesn't want states to get federal election aid so the system is more vulnerable.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 33 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    he's setting himself up for a coup from a general, at this point it could really happen

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 31 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    Fired the Democrat, but "allowed the Republican to resign". That is some petty shit. Not that it surprises me coming from Trump and the hairs he has hanging on to his balls like DeWitt.

    Can't wait to see how much phantom voter fraud his administration uncovers exclusively in states run by people Trump personally doesn't like. With no mention of how they know there is any fraud to begin with since it seems like they have fired everyone on the Federal side that had any direct insight into elections with this announcement.

    I'm sure someone in the media will get right on that line of thought when the time comes. /s

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 30 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Directly from the authoritarian playbook

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 28 points 2 months ago

    This was the plan from the beginning. Don’t act surprised now or when there are armed men at polling stations on Election Day.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.

    Thomas Jefferson

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 23 points 2 months ago*

    Can't win because you're shit? Cheat.

    • Republican Party Saying
  • source
  • [–] 22 points 2 months ago (11 children)

    The EAC supports elections but doesn’t run them, states and counties do that. So firing all its members freezes a federal support office, not the election machinery itself.

    Think of it as the standards lab that certifies equipment and hands out funds, not the referee on the field. The main effects:

    • Frozen certification of new voting machines (existing ones stay valid). So new companies can’t provide new equipment. Possibly means ‘the fix is in’ by Musk or associates

    • No rule changes to the federal registration form — which also blocks the administration from adding things like proof-of-citizenship before November. So this looks more like the regime is shooting it’s own foot here.

    • Stalled grants and guidance to states.

    Bottom line: it’s closer to paralysis than takeover, and it doesn’t change how you vote. The real open question is legal — whether firing bipartisan election commissioners survives a court challenge… if it is ever challenged in court by the dormant democrats.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 20 points 2 months ago (5 children)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 18 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Free elections...Russian style

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Who has 'Americans will do nothing to stop it' on their bingo card?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    At this point we cannot accept ANY outcome other than Democratic control of both houses. If somehow that isn’t the reported result it is clearly because of all of this bullshit and should NOT be accepted under any circumstances.

    The options are either we win or it’s rigged. Period.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 15 points 2 months ago

    Drump is one of the most hated presidents in US history, seriously none of this will work out in the favor of the Republican party. Fuel shortages start soon, all thanks to Trump's economy.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    So maybe I’m stupid but don’t states run elections? Why would they need anything from the feds? Like shouldn’t the feds just be completely gone in all ways during state run elections?

    I must be missing something here, will this even matter?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›