180

A Democratic senator has asked newly confirmed Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin to explain the department’s racist social media presence and assure the agency has not been “infiltrated by violent extremists.”

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., pointed to a March bulletin from Colorado law enforcement analysts that was unearthed by The Intercept last month. It warned that DHS posts using language popular with neo-Nazis could inspire acts of far-right violence within the U.S. as well as prompt white supremacists to join the agency.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] arctanthrope@lemmy.world 80 points 9 hours ago

ice was "infiltrated" by violent extremists in the same way that auto repair shops are "infiltrated" by mechanics

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Came here to say something similar. Aren't they being selected for this kind of work by people interested in them being like that?

[-] Smaile@lemmy.ca 18 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

infiltrated implys they snuck in, they deff didnt need to sneak in anywhere.

[-] NM_Gringo@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago

That's the best moral outrage the Democrats can come up with? Seriously? No wonder we get our ass kicked all the time.

[-] Uranus_Hz@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago

No. They can be even more morally outraged by the actual left wing of their own damned party.

[-] justaman123@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

This is like pushing back against the racist fascist policy in a way that gives the racist fascist policy an air of legitimacy. Like honestly its exactly the right move as planned opposition. Like did a think tank come up with this?

[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 13 points 9 hours ago
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

Other Narrator: Because they are.

[-] shittydwarf@piefed.ca 1 points 9 hours ago
[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

we can no longer rely on implication and insinuation. The hesitancy to call a spade a spade is a large part of how we got here. People saying we can't call trump a Nazis in 2016 dispute literally recycling Hitler's own rhetoric is part of how we got here.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

I blame the legacy media outlets. The very same that expressed grave concern for the violent tensions in Palestine but didn't call it a genocide until like this past winter.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

yup. the news media in particular refused to call anything like that what it was. Israeli attacks in gaza isn't genocide. the invasion into Lebanon isn't an invasion. Assassinations aren't assassinations.

Same goes for trump. they sanewash literally everything he says to make him not seem like a racist, fuck-faced nazis getting cucked by Netanyahu and Puttin- at the same time.

It's not just the news media, either. Democrats- particularly centrist dems- refuse to call genocide genocide, or even to simply recognize Palestinian-American's right to protest (and equal protection from counter protesters. ACAB in full force there.)

[-] jtrek@startrek.website 1 points 7 hours ago

I think that part of our problems come from people being too polite. Someone will say something completely stupid, and people don't want to make a fuss so they let it slide. Peer pressure is like the only thing that changes minds.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

For anyone that's ever seen Speak No Evil, an awful lot of the Tone Police running the media behave almost exactly the same way...gawd forbid we should ever make a Republican or a conservative feel uncomfortable for what they say and do and what their intentions are...

I'm trying to remember who it was, but I remember seeing some butthurt Republican just recently squawking over someone calling them a racist. They want to be free to be racist AF, but don't you dare call them one! That's like the worst thing someone can do!

[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 6 points 9 hours ago
[-] raman_klogius@ani.social 2 points 8 hours ago

The canary, if there's one, is already a pile of bones and feather at this stage.

[-] BigTuffAl@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 hours ago

Ain't gonna be no ICE after this shakes out so

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 8 hours ago

Some people have internalized the slaver -nazi-genocidal message so deeply, they consider themselves the good guys. Like zionazis.

[-] Steve@startrek.website 1 points 8 hours ago
[-] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

ICE was created as part of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 following the September 11 attacks. It absorbed the prior functions of the Immigration and Naturalization Service and the United States Customs Service.

The HSA was cosponsored by 118 members of Congress. Passed the House 295—132 with 6 not voting. It passed the U.S. Senate by a vote of 90—9, with one senator not voting. It was signed by George W. Bush in November 2002.

https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2002/roll367.xml

https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1072/vote_107_2_00249.htm?congress=107&session=2&vote=00249

So.. ultimately Osama Bin Laden is responsible for ICE, along with many of the other pro-fascism shifts the US has made in the last 25 years in response to those attacks.

He was extremely successful with his entire plan to destabilize and hurt America in response to the US fucking around in the middle east for decades prior.

this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2026
180 points (99.5% liked)

politics

30311 readers
2491 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS