724
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 66 points 1 week ago

There go your checks and balances.

[-] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 41 points 1 week ago

If we come back from this, one of the first things needs to be the US Marshall service being moved under control of the Judiciary. So they have an actual enforcement arm for their decisions, instead of relying entirely on the Executive, which clearly will just ignore the decisions, and Congress will sit idly by.

Congress has two ways to override the Executive, one is veto overrides. The other is impeachment, which also can override the Judicial, and the processes include the enforcement of those decisions.

The Executive enforces laws as its primary function. As such, they can enforce those laws against the Legislative and Judicial as necessary.

One of the two main purposes of the Judicial branch is to ensure the other two are writing the laws correctly, and that those laws follow the requirements of existing ones, like the Constitution. So they can rule on passed laws, but they do not have a mechanism to enforce those, they rely on the Executive to do that, even if the Executive is the issue. Or they rely on the Legislative to act on a lack of enforcement.

The Judicial as it sits, is both one of the strongest and weakest links in the system. And until now, that weak part hasn't really been exposed since the Justice Department has historically been generally left to operate independently of the President, even though nothing actually prevents it from being abused like this.

[-] Manjushri@piefed.social 10 points 1 week ago

Congress also needs to re-establish it's own enforcement capabilities. The "guard rooms" in the capitol need to be fitted with modern prison cells and the Sergeants at Arms of the House and Senate need to have contingents of trained officers under their own command. It's high time that people refusing to answer to Congress or committing contempt of Congress be detained properly without having to wait on a corrupt Department of Justice to to their job.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] shittydwarf@piefed.ca 62 points 1 week ago
[-] athatet@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago

Yeah right. Like we can afford to pay five.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bangupjobasusual@lemmy.world 59 points 1 week ago

Hold them in contempt you fucking cowards!

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Specifically Civil contempt, since that can't be pardoned away like criminal contempt.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So the court needs to sack up and send marshalls to the DOJ to go get it,charge the relevant people with contempt of court, and let them sit in jail. These people dont have immunity from a judges order.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So the court needs to sack up and send marshalls to the DOJ

We all know that's never going to happen. Hell, it's a coin flip as to whether a US Marshall would even obey the order.

There people dont have immunity from a judges order.

枪杆子里面出政权

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago

Amazing that they "accidentally exposed" hundreds of victims, but none of the culprits...

[-] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago

Trump's Department of Justice refuses to release Epstein files to the public

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Mediocre_Bard_Redeux@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago

Don't worry, I'm sure that not enacting any type of consequence will surely get them to see the error of their ways.

[-] El_Scapacabra@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago

What do you mean, no consequences? They'll get SLAMMED for sure!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

knew he would. now reel him in on contempt

[-] fodor@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 week ago

Here we are again and the question is if the judge is going to confront the constitutional disaster. Will they lock people up? Will they fine the US attorneys thousands of dollars per day until they comply? It really is that simple of a question.

[-] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 21 points 1 week ago

Ugh, the Biden crime family at it again!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 21 points 1 week ago

At this point, I guess they burned them all.

[-] santa@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago

Take it to the top. It’ll be very difficult to argue a recent law of Congress not being fulfilled.

[-] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Who's going to do anything? It's a fascist country, and this will be our future.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2026
724 points (99.6% liked)

politics

30415 readers
2767 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS