204
where the fuck are all these trans and non binary kids shows Republicans keep seeing?
Have you never heard of TRANSformers??
Trans World Airlines???
I mean, I guess there’s The Amazing Digital Circus, as long as you don’t look too hard at it.
They still haven't gotten over ABC's Modern Family.
Replace trans with any other identity and you will see how utterly ridiculous this is.
Imagine if racists started demanding a government-enforced "racial" warning for shows featuring non-whites. That's how this current era of anti-LGBT bigotry is going to be seen by people in the future, and we should be embarassed to let our society be associated with it.
Replace trans with any other identity
In Muslim countries:
This TV show contains FEMALE actors, Viewer discretion is advised!!
In Wyoming and the Vatican:
This TV show contains CHILD actors, Viewer discretion is advised!!
In Alabama:
This TV show contains actors that are family RELATED, Viewer discretion is advised!!
I think the FCC may be on to something, that these warnings may be necessary.
/s
Why the hell are they so concerned with what's in other people's pants?
They are disappointed by what's in their own?
Not a bad theory, I guess
They (not-so) secretly want what's in other people's pants.
After all we wouldn't want kids to grow up thinking they should accept people different, ot maybe the same as, themselves.
People looking to have society help them maintain a message of hate.
I've long thought that every show that has a child in it should have a warning, because we know how most children were created, right? Of course, I would never mention it, and I am extremely disturbed that you are thinking about it right now! You will burn in hell!
'trans' topics is just 'people' topics.
the programming on fox 'news' and other similarly-themed outlets is what actually is damaging to not only younger viewers, but all viewers. how about warnings before, after, and super-imposed over the top of all that bullshit...
I cannot imagine being this triggered by something that's not too close to home. I think it's pretty obvious the reason why trans porn is becoming a top porn site search and it's a certainty that it's majority Republicans when they use title words like trap or shemale. Reddit is absolutely packed with these subs in every mundane search.
Ironically the supposed "massive increase" of trans or non-binary identification clearly doesn't represent the real population with this many closeted bigots.
... Audiences.... Like Republicans and other cults.
I ignore all the other warnings, signs, advertising anyways so really it's just more garbage to ignore. but I get the overall wtf no idea
Well the good news is broadcast networks are dying and the Republicans don't want the FCC to have jurisdiction over the internet (they killed net neutrality under the argument the FCC doesn't have a right to regulate it), so this will mean fuck-all to places like Netflix or HBO and most folks watch stuff on streaming services these days anyway.
Also does this mean any sci-fi shows with alien races who don't have genders will have warnings? Like it's just fucking asinine.
As in, if a show is transphobic or cisnormative then they'll give a warning, right?
I started watching "Pose" so far I'm enjoying the characters and the writing
this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
204 points (99.0% liked)
politics
30435 readers
3474 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS