this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
74 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15915 readers
32 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 year ago (8 children)
[–] [email protected] 73 points 1 year ago (14 children)

raddle is where like four weird lifestyle anarchists (this is code words for libertarians with left aesthetics) pretend to be a lot more than four users

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Aren't lifestylists individualists rather than on the libertarian left? Isn't that the whole reason Bookchin denounced them?

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

maybe this is a regional thing, but when I think "libertarian" with no modifiers it's weirdo american right wingers, so i'm saying these are super individualists who are opposed to collective action and just pretend to be leftist anarchists

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doesn't raddle hate leftists though? They're pretty open about it: https://youtube.com/watch?v=50x0qcddf2k

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes but they also pretend to be them

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Someone called them out for banning leftists yesterday and got banned for it. It was hilarious: https://raddle.me/f/meta/177962/how-come-you-re-so-quick-to-ban-leftists-for-the-slightest

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Wow...that really is something else. It's like a weird bizzaro version of what the right wing thinks the left wing is like. Also "paranoid" is apparently an ableist slur now. I didn't get the memo, but as someone with a paranoia based disorder I hereby give everyone here the P-word pass.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Damn takes me back.

Just from memory, I think Raddle started as an alt-Reddit back when shitredditsays was still a thing. I remember getting an invite on the IRC.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 year ago (2 children)

hexbear dunking on raddle dunking on lemmy dunking on raddle astronaut-2 hesitation-2 astronaut-1

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago

need to learn to leave people on read tbh lenin-sure

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I went into that thread to talk to them but holy fuck, these replies are essentially demanding trans people self harm

Large concentration of trans people on hexbear just goes to show that not all queer people are cool people, and we're not automatically going to have anything more in common just by sharing a part of our identity. I don't think trans tankies are any better than cis tankies.

No you in fact do share a lot, it's been my experience overwhelmingly that our experiences are very uniform. I can talk and relate to people from all over the globe trivially, things are that shit for us everywhere. This sort of rhetoric is detrimental to the survival of the trans community, and is purely for the sake of ideology. For fucks sake, 90% of trans people are socialist. This is essentially encouraging trans people to check out of the community that helps them most (and I have had one person internalize this argument in person! It led to total self ostracization of help for ideological reasons). Sectarianism is so fuckin ridiculous, and is even more ridiculous in the trans community. In my view, it's incredibly important to have large non corporate trans spaces, it is easier to translate online activity to real world activity with trans people because we're desperate to get good things happening. This rhetoric tries to interdict that

tankies are worse because they should know better than to do around the clock propaganda for authoritarian homophobic states

Trans people get food and housing in these states, which is the biggest issue to fix in the west, based on my experience working with people. Mutual aid and charity have unfortunately been unable to tackle this completely, and regardless, the rhetoric before interdicts even anarchist mutual aid

most people have no authority-consciousness but marginalized people absolutely do, and yet some of us choose to use that consciousness to push for more authority, convinced stalin 2.0 is going to liberate us. it's obscene

Specters still haunting

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

not all queer people are cool people,

Norman Finkelstein is right? apparently radlibs really do only care about LGBT for building their social capital as fashionable

I don't think trans tankies are any better than cis tankies.

sicko-fem

convinced stalin 2.0 is going to liberate us. it's obscene

lol how's your "liberatory free markets" doing in Ukraine after leftoids heroically SMASHED THE STALINIST STATE in the 2014 coup? Remember that psychotic genocidal trans who was fired for being too mask off in their obscenity? Hmm

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Lmao gulags? Prison slavery is legal in the US, and those prisons are privately owned with quotas to meet.

But please, lecture me about gulags

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Yeah I'm aware, very special. Doesn't bother me, it's just sad that they're hurting themselves and encouraging others to do so. Also saying that stat is incorrect is nonsense, I polled a large lgbt org for that number, over 100 trans people so likely very representative for my area which statistically should have around 1000 trans people. There have been more systematic estimates suggesting 80% are hard left. Could be involvement in an org boosts it by 10%

They can say China doesn't have free shelters or cheap as hell housing all they want, I have contact with many trans groups in China that handle mutual aid, I take their word over ziqs or checks notes the fucking Economist. Id really like to increase the Chinese speaking community here so you can hear it direct from them. It's still not a picnic but the conditions are different, which is unique.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

so ziq's in that thread mocking db0 and calling them a tankie, isn't db0 an anarchist / anarchist adjacent(?)

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Apparently anarcho-lifestylists think ancoms are secret tankies or something. You can see their feud start here: https://raddle.me/f/Anarchism/81827/how-anarcho-communism-would-create-authority

Highlight: Db0 calls ziq an authoritarian for opposing democracy.

It was then turned into an even bigger anti-ancom rant:

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/ziq-burn-the-bread-book-make-anarchy

[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 year ago (2 children)

“How would you feed people then, genius?” I hear you scoff. The answer is simple; tried and tested for millennia. I wouldn’t feed people.

LMAO

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

People would feed themselves instead of expecting others to labor to feed them; an entitlement that arose with industrial civilization. People would be inclined to protect the forests instead of bulldozing them for the supposed convenience of industrial food production if they picked their food directly from those forests everyday.

They’d protect the forests with their very lives because they’d need the food that grows in the forests to survive without industrial farms, bakeries and factories outsourcing food production and then hiding the ecocide they cause just out of sight of the villages and their carefully manicured streets.

what a terrible solution. so individualist its almost darwinian. it is also ecocidal in itself, by creating a world in which humans compete with animals, humans will kill animals. without farming, you are now competing with deer and whatever schmuck or tribe moves faster than you. theres a reason humans would go out and kill various 'pest' animals and predators: their existence demanded it at the time, for better or worse. the only way to buck this trend is with proper technology and planning. lets also just forget how many plants you need to feed a family sustainably, and also lets forget how much modern agriculture (and breeding, which you are taking advantage of when you grow these supposedly 'natural' plants, which oftentimes cant grow without perfect soil conditions given how altered they are, fuck lets forget that many forests have a severe dearth of any native food edible to humans) multiplies the productivity of plants, this plan is inherently genocidal. there is also a mention from ziq that seems to imply that complex forest ecosystems of the past were naturally more productive than agriculture. but why, then, did humans begin to cultivate plants? for funsies?

also, people do get tied up with literal family trees and demand protections of forests, this is common in most societies that are not settler-colonial and heavily urbanized

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Social darwinists seem to forget that selfish species go extinct quite frequently

Also your big bad predators. Wolves, lions, bald eagles, all endangered. Any animal can end up that way. Humans too if we fail to manage our environment correctly.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Also the idea that ancient forests were more productive for humans gives off Christian brain worms vibes

Like yeah we should just get naked and eat apples forever and laugh at God for telling us not to talk to snakes. That's how this reads to me

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago

It is inherently genocidal because subsistence farming has pretty low carrying capacity, and hunting and gathering even lower. Abandoning industial agriculture means starvation for 90% of world's population.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago

No gods, no editors

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Fucking called it, the tankie hate is just anti-leftism

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

This now an AMA post.

@[email protected], how do you feel about showering with your homies? Personally, I can't really respect a person until I've seen their hog.

e: pronoun correction

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago

Dunking this, dunking that, how about we all dunk some Oreos in milk and have a nice day

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (20 children)

alright, enough of this showboating, @[email protected] let's settle this on the court, our best 3 against your best 3, street rules... unless you're chicken??

fidel-balling

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

spoilerTheir best 3 are all ziq alts.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Always fun to go on Raddle and read a conversation between ziq and their many alts

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

Ziq is they them from what someone said here

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Lmao

I've been too busy working the past few days to keep up with online drama

I'm fucking tired but it's cool I made the even more terminally online "leftists" at raddle mad hehehe

Would it be too online of me to write a response?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›