top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 49 points 4 months ago (14 children)

This centralization of Linux worries me

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 60 points 4 months ago* (5 children)

    It shouldn't. Linux users are like cats. The harder you try to herd them in one direction, the more directions they find to go. Just because they all happen to be in one place at one particular time doesn't mean they will suffer any obligation to stay there the moment someone decides they want them to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    It's less that and just the absolute ridiculous scope creep of systemd. Again it was meant to just replace init. All it needs to do is boot the kernel and run at launch services, and people disagree on that last part.

    It shouldn't be basically a second layer to the kernel in both application and necessity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Yes, but the centralization runs so much deeper! We should ditch the centralized linux kernel and create at least 10 completely new kernels that are barely compatible to each other but will ensure our freedom and provide choice to the community!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Coincidentally, today I removed systemd from my laptop (Debian Trixie.) It was reasonably easy. I booted from a USB drive into a shell through debian's "rescue" mode and typed plausible-looking apt commands until it worked. For some reason it didn't create /etc/inittab and I made a typo when I tried to do it myself, but other than that no problems. Differences noticed so far that a normal user would care about: none. If nothing goes wrong I guess I'll do the same on my desktop at home this weekend, because why not.

    Nothing against systemd, but I think it's valuable to continue having other options and it was fun to see that it's still pretty easy to use them (maybe harder if you're a GNOME user, idk.)

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I find it extremely hard to believe that worked, let alone left you with a bootable system, let alone properly working.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago

    I was surprised as well. I found the instructions at debian.org somewhat confusing, and I'm not sure if they're completely comprehensive or accurate — but they were the most useful reference I found and provide a good idea of what it's like.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago

    Systemd is open source. Its bindings are open source. If snowflake distro's want to maintain this compatibility they can maintain it.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    No problem. I'm drifting away from flatpak, anyway. Anything that's married to systemd is going to be a problem for an increasing number of people, over time.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 9 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    NixOS is the only thing that made systemd a reasonable tool for me.

    I do not like the entire paradigm of how it works.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    I love NixOS, but I hate how coupled to systemd it is.

    I tried to make a microVM image of NixOS the other day, using tini as the init system. Large parts of the core NixOS lifecycle simply don’t work at all without systemd.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    Looks like postmarketos already put in work to have systemd working in it. That takes care of my concerns there

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    Works for me

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    OH NO, they must be devastated!

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (10 children)

    Guaranteed absence of flatpak will be a motivation for some to choose a non-systemd distro

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Flatpak has been pretty optional on most distros I've used. Snap on the other hand...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    That sucks for me as a Guix user. I haven't managed to package a GUI app I'm using from Flatpak so it was a nice escape hatch for me.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Well this sucks. I use Flatpak all the time, so I guess this means I'm going to be even more dependent on systemd than I was before.

    I don't hate systemd as much as most of its detractors; in fact I like how easy it makes it to manage services, but with the age verification attestation controversy, and the performance improvements I witnessed switching my Pi-Hole box from Debian to Alpine, these things have caused me to question my use of systemd.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›