93
submitted 1 day ago by cm0002@lemy.lol to c/linux@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Pandasdontfly@anarchist.nexus 6 points 1 day ago

Sadly I just dont think this is true. For now non systemd distros work fine but eventually if this course doesn't change you'll be heavily inconvenienced at the best and downright struggling at the worst if you choose to not use it I fear.

[-] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz -1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

That's because systemd is just good, if it stops being or something better comes along, people will move. There's no loyalty or entrapment here. This would be bad if a company did it with proprietary software, because then the company could lock people in... this is just nothing like that.

[-] Pandasdontfly@anarchist.nexus 2 points 15 hours ago

Right, I don't think its actually 'bad' in anyway centralization is convienient! I just think its overall terrible for the users. While jumping ship obv can happen every hour spent on developing one option means that get rid of it as you have more systems to remake.

this post was submitted on 25 May 2026
93 points (97.0% liked)

Linux

13785 readers
545 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS