195
submitted 18 hours ago by Grumpus_Maximus to c/historymemes@piefed.social
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Jumi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago
[-] Sir_Premiumhengst@lemmy.world 14 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

There are two types of people in this world. Those who use the metric system, and those who lose against people who are Vietnamese ~~peasants~~ in the jungle.

[-] GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

But the French invented the metric system.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

the french also invented losing to the vietmin.

at one point they asked us to nuke dien bien phu. no shit.

so this is rich lol

[-] fox2263@lemmy.world 15 points 11 hours ago

The French have won more wars the the USA

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Pretty much everybody has won more wars than the USA...

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 7 points 10 hours ago

Yeah, but what about the one people actually remember?

If we start looking at past victories where do we stop? I mean, Italy is not exactly Rome...

[-] collectif_imaginaire@piefed.social 85 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

We at least conquered Vietnam.

But still we couldn't keep it and have been humiliated at dien-bien-phu which is a very well known military defeat.

Also because colonialism is nothing to be proud of. Vietnam went from euro invaders leaving to american invaders inviting themselves in less than a year,

and they beat both

[-] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 24 points 12 hours ago

It's a shit take but so is "the French surrender immediately".

The French soldiers had a pretty impressive track record and fought well in WWII. French military planning used outdated strategies, though, and let the Germans encircle them to the point where evacuating the Allied soldiers to England was the last reasonable choice. And the French still managed to hold off the Germans for long enough to evacuate 300,000 men. The rest went quickly because it's hard to fight a war when you just had to evacuate most of your soldiers. Without their equipment.

Likewise, the USA had a decent military track record and well-equipped professional soldiers. But that didn't mean shit when they were (from the NV perspective) the bad guys in an anticolonial war of liberation with broad support from the civilian population. Vietnam was a guerilla war, to which there was no good doctrinal answer back then. And even today those are hard to deal with.

So yeah, "the French surrender when they see the enemy" is on the same level as "the US Army can't stand against the military might of a bunch of rice farmers".

[-] WalleyeWarrior@midwest.social 7 points 10 hours ago

Plus, people don't realize how close Rommel was to complete encirculation when he drove to the channel. He ignored all orders to halt his advance because he couldn't be supplied or reinforced. Fortunately for him, the French and British troops had no clue what was going on and couldn't capitalize on his precarious position. It was a complete failure of French military doctrine.

[-] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

Yeah. While you could argue that it's no shame be surprised by a madman who keeps advancing with no concern for supply routes, it is a shame to be unprepared for mobile warfare in general. An army with more awareness of the possibilities tanks of the era offered could've countered him. Of course such an army also wouldn't have relied on the Maginot Line.

The French fought valiantly but no amount of valor can offset catastrophically bad leadership.

[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 hours ago

So the French did a 'strategic retreat' but the Americans did infact lose a guerrilla war to some rice farmers.

[-] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago

Well, the rice farmers were supporting a dedicated military force with the backing of two major countries and a robust covert logistics network. That kinda changes things a little bit.

[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 hours ago

You aren't doing a very good job of countering the thesis that the 'US lost a war to rice farmers'. Of course they had support, so did the US, and the US lost.

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 hours ago

Arms manufacturers won. And they're still winning. No matter how we frame our thoughts.

[-] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

The army and the foreign support did a lot of heavy lifting there. Discounting them is like saying that the American Civil War was won by a bunch of escaped cotton pickers. Sure, those escaped cotton pickers fought alongside the armed forces of some twenty-ish American states but they participated so we can attribute victory to them.

To bring the logic to the extreme, WWII was singlehandedly won by a French tennis player. Sure, his contribution consisted of finding American soldiers to rescue prisoners from the SS during the Battle of Castle Itter but he fought against the Third Reich and we'll just look past everyone else who did. (If that isn't absurd enough for you, I also could've nominated an SS officer as the war's winner, also from the same battle. It was a very weird battle.)

[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago

That is very well put. Good one.

[-] WalleyeWarrior@midwest.social 1 points 10 hours ago

Pretty much the entire US plan on Vietnam was "tactical retreat". Spend a week clearing the VC from this hill and return to base. Then go back out in 6 months and clear the VC from that hill again.

[-] NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world 46 points 17 hours ago

and they beat both

Heh, that's before China invaded.

and they beat all three

Oh.

[-] sartalon@lemmy.world 16 points 16 hours ago

To be fair, they invited us in. Pretty sure Nixon heard someone in South Vietnam say, "United States" 3 times in front of a mirror.

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 25 points 15 hours ago

All they understood was "Vietnam" and that was enough.

[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 46 points 17 hours ago

can we not? colonialism really isn't the flex you think it is.

[-] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 8 points 9 hours ago

Colonianism is only bad when americans do it, apparently.

Remember that france is the country that made haiti pay reparations after the haitian slave revolt and never paid the money back.

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

Oh, the French history in Haiti is way worse than that.

[-] westingham@sh.itjust.works 23 points 18 hours ago

Translation: At least we conquered Vietnam

[-] remotelove@lemmy.ca 12 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Who the fuck calls french monkeys? Frogs maybe, but not a monkey. It's slightly derogatory in some cases, but not the way I think of it, and for a very good reason. (I still probably wouldn't go out of my way to call a French person a frog.)

I learned the French being referenced as frogs from Art Spiegelman’s Maus when I was a kid and it was in a positive context. The way he used animals in his books was brilliant. While the trend obviously started from cats and mice (Nazis and Jews), the use of other animals was super interesting. It kinda flipped the meaning of the terms in a very somber way.

I can't quite put my finger on it, or even put words to it, but expressing the slang as actual characters is something to take very seriously in its underlying meaning. Regardless, Spiegelman didn't pull any punches when it came to showing how nasty people could actually be.

[-] Uruanna@lemmy.world 15 points 15 hours ago

"Cheese eating surrender monkeys" was a well-known insult during the 2000's for several years after France refused to help the US attack Iraq. The whole freedom fries period.

[-] timeghost@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

So fucked up, I mean, why bring cheese into this?

[-] Uruanna@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

I mean, France does eat cheese, that part is accurate.

[-] MattBlackAlien@lemmy.world 11 points 17 hours ago
[-] ODuffer@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago
[-] remotelove@lemmy.ca 4 points 16 hours ago

(Not to be confused with monkey hangers/ape hangers/monkey bars, which are also terms for excessively tall handle bars on motorcycles.)

[-] WalleyeWarrior@midwest.social 2 points 9 hours ago

Monkey bars are playground equipment about 5 feet off the ground for children to swing from.

[-] Soulg@ani.social 8 points 17 hours ago

I mean these are all jokes but I've definitely heard surrender monkey (primarily from Simpsons now that I think about it, which was also clearly in jest)

[-] QueenOfSquiggles@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago

Any chance a somewhat self-respecting american can get a translation "see foo play?"

[-] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 18 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I’m pretty sure it’s roughly “at least we beat Vietnam”

[-] QueenOfSquiggles@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

Appreciated ❤️ I've learned a little Spanish, a little Portuguese, a little Japanese, and even a little Latin and Vietnamese. French still evades me 😭

[-] P1k1e@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

At least we conquered vietnam

[-] Cenotaph@mander.xyz 3 points 18 hours ago

"At least we beat vietnam"

this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
195 points (100.0% liked)

History Memes

2550 readers
1445 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism (including tankies/red fash), atrocity denial or apologia, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Piefed.social rules.

  5. History referenced must be 20+ years old.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

OTHER COMMS IN THE HISTORYVERSE:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS